Resistance @ 95 from Resistance @ 35

  • Thread starter Thread starter bibincjoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an equation for calculating resistance at different temperatures, specifically comparing resistance at 95°C to resistance at 35°C. Participants explore the implications of the equation in the context of voltage drop calculations for bus ducts, examining the temperature coefficient of resistance and the meaning of various terms within the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek clarification on the equation: Resistance@95 = R@35 x (1+α*(95x(I/Io)²+20))/(1+75x α), particularly the term "(95x(I/Io)²+20)" and its components.
  • One participant mentions a standard equation for resistance at different temperatures: R@T2 = R@20(1+a@20(T2-20)), and questions how it relates to the posted equation.
  • There is speculation that "Io" may refer to the design rating current, while "I" is the actual load current.
  • Another participant provides an alternative version of the equation, suggesting that the original may contain a typo regarding the temperature values.
  • Some participants discuss the relevance of the Callendar van Dusen equation and its application to the topic, noting its utility in understanding temperature coefficients.
  • One participant raises a question about whether the value "55" in the equation should change based on ambient temperature, linking it to standards for bus ducts.
  • There is a suggestion that the equation could be interpreted to calculate resistance at a specific temperature rise under load conditions, depending on ambient temperature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the equation and its components, with no consensus reached on the correct application or meaning of certain terms. Multiple competing views remain regarding the equation's formulation and its implications for resistance calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for additional context or definitions for terms used in the equation, particularly regarding the source of the voltage drop calculation sheet and the meanings of "Io" and "R0." There are also unresolved questions about the appropriateness of the temperature values used in the equation.

bibincjoy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Please explain the below:
Resistance@95 =R@35 x (1+α*(95x(I/Io)²+20))/(1+75x α) at the actual current A (I Act).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
bibincjoy said:
Please explain the below:
Resistance@95 =R@35 x (1+α*(95x(I/Io)²+20))/(1+75x α) at the actual current A (I Act).

Welcome to the PF.

Why don't you start by telling us what you know about that equation. :smile:
 
I know the basic equation to find resistance at different temp from the following:

R@T2 = R@20(1+a@20(T2-20),

where,
"T2" is the temperature at which the new resistance to be found,
"a" (alpha) is the temperature coefficient @ 20deg C (0.00393)

I am trying to understand the posted equation as it was found in a voltage drop calculation sheet for Busduct.

I would like to know "(95x(I/Io)²+20))" this part. whether 95 is the "T2" temperature if so, how that "+20" came there.

Reply would be highly appreciated.
 
Is this a question about the resistance of metallic conductors at different temperatures ?

Please post a link to the “voltage drop calculation sheet for Busduct” you are using.
 
Voltage drop sheet link

Baluncore said:
Is this a question about the resistance of metallic conductors at different temperatures ?

Please post a link to the “voltage drop calculation sheet for Busduct” you are using.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/kyz406zpowrw2wy/VD for PF .pdf
 
We now have the definitions for most of the terms in the equation.
We do not know what the symbol Io refers to. Maybe it is the design rating current?
It seems that the 35 and 95 are probably conductor temperatures 35°C and 95°C.

You were unable to understand the equation given the “Voltage drop sheet”.
At PF we are only human, like you, we need more information or context from the manufacturers website.
Where did you get the “Voltage drop sheet” page from ?

If you cannot give us a link to the manufacturers website, then we can only guess and you will need to direct your question to the equipment supplier.
 
Baluncore said:
We now have the definitions for most of the terms in the equation.
We do not know what the symbol Io refers to. Maybe it is the design rating current?
It seems that the 35 and 95 are probably conductor temperatures 35°C and 95°C.

You were unable to understand the equation given the “Voltage drop sheet”.
At PF we are only human, like you, we need more information or context from the manufacturers website.
Where did you get the “Voltage drop sheet” page from ?

If you cannot give us a link to the manufacturers website, then we can only guess and you will need to direct your question to the equipment supplier.

Thank you for your guess. I searched the web for this equation; all i found was the standard equation. Wanted to know whether is there any standard equation like R@T2 = R@20(1+α@20(T2-20).

As you mentioned "Io" is the rated design current and "I" is the actual load current.
 
Attached is another version of the bus duct equation, downloaded from;
http://furutec.com.my/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/standard09.pdf

The equation boils down to the following;
Code:
         1 + a * ( 55 * ( I/Io )^2 + 20 )
R = Ro * --------------------------------
         1 + a * ( 55              + 20 )
The 75 = 55 + 20 is being used to blend two conditions.
Your original version of the equation seems confused?
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Looks like the 95 in your equation was from a typo in the original document. It should be 55.
 
  • #10
Wanted to know whether is there any standard equation like R@T2 = R@20(1+α@20(T2-20).

read up on "Callendar van Dusen" equation
http://static.elitesecurity.org/uploads/2/6/2694332/CalVan.pdf

alpha is the slope at some particular temperature

and your term, (95x(I/Io)²+20))/(1+75x α),

appears to be modifying alpha for some different starting temperatureWhile most explanations of Callendar focus on platinum resistance thermometry, it's a really handy bit of algebra. When you can convert the quadratic coefficients A B and C into [itex]\alpha[/itex] and [itex]\delta[/itex] of eq(6) in that link , you've got it.
.................

now - at zero current your equation reduces to
Resistance@95 =R@35 x (1+α*(95x(I/Io)²+20))/(1+75x α)
= R@35 x (1 + 20[itex]\alpha[/itex])/(1+75[itex]\alpha[/itex])
= R@35X(1.0786)/(1.29475)
= 0.833R@35which doesn't make much sense unless there's active cooling of that duct.
so check my arithmetic...

I suspect a misplaced paren.OOps i see Baluncore fixed it while i was typing !

oh well as Sophie says, cross posts mean it's an interesting topic.
I learned something about bus duct - thanks, guys

old jim
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #11
Thank you everyone for the reply. And its getting interesting. Sorry to go further, becoz i would like to have a proper idea behind that equation.

I am attaching few docs for your reference, which i found in the web, which shall be useful to you all.

>>> supporting doc for R@t2 = R@20(1+α(t2-20). https://www.dropbox.com/s/41oadn016oea1su/The temperature coefficient of resistance of copper.pdf
>>> load-temperature correction factors.

I would like to know whether the value "55" shall change based on ambient temp. As per IEC the max temp rise allowed for busducts is 105degC, if so, for an operating temp of 50degC, the value "55" remains OK; provided we put the resistance value Ro as the R@50 deg C.

Based on the equation,

R = Ro * (1 + a * ( 55 * ( I/Io )^2 + 20 ))/ (1 + a * 75)


can we conclude that the "R" is the resistance at 95 deg rise at load current at an ambient temp of 50deg C, again the value Ro has to be R@50.

If so, i think my equation also is correct as

R = R@20 * (1 + a * ( 105-20) * ( I/Io )^2 + 20 ))/ (1 + a * 75)

as here we put the Ro as R@20 considering the ambient temp to be 20degC.

Please comment.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K