Resistance of a semicircular conductor with a rectangular cross section

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the resistance of a semicircular conductor with a rectangular cross-section, defined by inner radius r1, outer radius r2, width b, and resistivity ρ_R. The derived formula for resistance R is R = (πρ_R)/b, indicating that resistance is independent of the radii. Participants express confusion regarding the role of the radii in resistance calculations and suggest alternative approaches, such as integrating the conductance of thin semicircular slices to clarify the relationship between geometry and resistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical resistance and Ohm's Law
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of conductance and its relationship to resistance
  • Basic concepts of resistivity and its implications in conductor design
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of resistance in cylindrical and semicircular conductors
  • Learn about the principles of conductance and resistance in parallel circuits
  • Explore advanced integration techniques in vector calculus
  • Investigate the effects of varying cross-sectional shapes on electrical resistance
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physics, and materials science who are involved in analyzing and designing conductive materials and systems.

Basel H
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is a conductor with the square-shaped area. the Radii are r1 , r2 with width b and resistivity ## \rho_R##.
Find the resistance R between A and B
Aufgabe6.PNG


2. Homework Equations

##I = \iint_A\vec J \cdot d \vec A##
## \vec J = \kappa \vec E ##
## \vec E = \rho \vec J##
## V = \int\vec E\cdot d\vec s ##
## V = IR##

The Attempt at a Solution


## I = \iint_A\vec J \cdot d \vec A = Jb(r_2-r_1)##
## \vec J = {\frac{I}{b(r_2-r_1)}}\hat e_\theta ##
## \vec E = \rho_R \vec J = (\rho_R I/b(r_2-r_1) ) \hat e_\theta##
## V = \int_0^\pi \vec E\cdot d\vec s ##
## d \vec s = r d\theta \hat e_\theta ##
## V = {\frac{\pi \rho_R I r}{b(r_2-r_1)}}##
The Total Voltage
## \int d V = \int {\frac{\pi \rho_R I d r}{b(r_2-r_1)}} ##[/B]
After integration over ##[r_1, r_2]##
## V = IR = {\frac{\pi \rho_R I}{b}} ##
## R = {\frac{\pi \rho_R }{b}} ##
I don't know, if the solution is right. It is a bit weird since R is not dependent of the Radii but the units are right.
I hope someone can clear my confusion and help me :)
 

Attachments

  • Aufgabe6.PNG
    Aufgabe6.PNG
    4.4 KB · Views: 1,190
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you think that the radii should play a role. It would seem so at first glance. Consider some extremes. One case I can think of: what if r2 is just a little bigger than r1, but both r1 and r2 are very large (you essentially have a very long wire). What happens if r1 and r2 are very small?

I was thinking of approaching the problem this way: what if you slice it into thin semicircles, then find the conductance of a semicircular slice (conductance is reciprocal of resistance). You can sum up (integrate) all of these parallel conductances, since conductances in parallel just add.
Once you have an expression for conductance, just take the reciprocal to find the resistance. I haven't worked all the calculations through, but the radii do play a role, in this situation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K