Resistance of Fractals: Sierpinski Triangle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mersecske
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractals Resistance
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electrical resistance of fractals, specifically the Sierpinski triangle and Menger sponge, under the assumption of homogeneous conductivity. Participants explore the implications of fractal geometry on resistance measurements and calculations, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the resistance between two points on a Sierpinski triangle is infinite due to the infinite resistance at each contact point as the fractal recurses.
  • Others argue that the resistance of a Menger sponge may be finite, suggesting calculations could reveal a converging series of resistance values.
  • A participant questions the practicality of measuring resistance in fractals, noting that contact areas and the nature of probes complicate the situation.
  • Some participants discuss the need for contact areas to be surfaces to avoid infinite resistance, while others highlight the challenges of current flow in fractal geometries.
  • There is a mention of the relationship between surface area and volume in three-dimensional fractals, with some asserting that this leads to infinite resistance for finite cubes.
  • A later reply introduces the idea of a discrete fractal grid with finite resistance units, prompting further exploration of resistance in the context of a Sierpinski triangle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the resistance of fractals, with no consensus reached regarding whether the resistance is finite or infinite. The discussion remains unresolved as various models and assumptions are presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of contact areas, the challenges in calculating resistance for fractal geometries, and the unresolved nature of how to measure resistance in practical scenarios.

mersecske
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
Let assume an exact mathematical fractal on a surface,
for example Sierpinski-triangle,
made of material with homogeneous conductivity.
What do you think,
it has zero, finite, or infinite resistance between two points
(for example two corner of the triangle)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The resistance at each point contact of one triangle to another is infinite. Recursing from the zeroth single to the first order the resistance is infinity at every contact. Every subsequent order gets the same, ad infinitium it seems.

You should be aware that, given any infinite plan or volume of material having nonzero resistivity, the resistance between any two ideal point contacts is infinite resistance. In real life, Ohm meter probes do not contact at an idealized point, but over an area. It is the contact parimeter of the probes that dictates the reading on a DVM rather than the resistivity of the material, beyond the kin of the electrical engineers who normally specify such sorts of measurements.
 
Last edited:
OK, this is true.
But what about the resistance between
oposite sides of a Menger sponge?
Its existed and finite?
 
Why don't you try it and see what happens? Start with a solid cube of unit resistivity. Call this cube the zeroth order Menger sponge. Calculate it's resistance. Take out the proscribed 6 cubes out of 27 and calculate again for the 1st order Menger sponge. Then do it for the 2nd order sponge. See if this series of resistance values converges to zero or something else.
 
Very hard to calculate.
And not possible to measure :)
And the contacts are still not clear!
Maybe we have to take infinite wire with fractal cross section
?
 
Hmm. The two contacts have to be surfaces or the resistance automatically becomes infinity.

I presumed you intended to pick opposite faces of the cube. For your zeroth order unit cube the contact area is one unit square. The sequence for the contact area is (1, 9/10, 81/100...).
 
Yes but the current flow is very difficult
 
If you know your contact areas tend to infinity, it really doesn't matter how you model the rest of it.
 
Do you now what is fractal?
The fractal has finite surface!
Only its circumference is infinity.
 
  • #10
Yes, well, in the case of your 3 dimensional fractal, the volume tends to zero as the surface area increases.

But I see I made an error in my last post. I meant to say "If you know your contact areas tends to infinitely small, it really doesn't matter how you model the rest of it."

Anyway, this is the case with your fractal, and so the resistance for a finite cube is automatically infinite. The series 1, 9/10, 81/100 ... tends to zero.
 
  • #11
The series (8/9)^n, but yes.
 
  • #12
And what about if you imagine a discrete fractal grid, with finite resistance units, for example a Sierpinski-triangular?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
508
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
6K