Resistance of graphene dispersion

simsCity
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I just got a small bottle of graphene dispersion (not GO) on ebay and put a small drop on a ciruit board as shown in the pic. I expected to measure a finite resistance because graphene is a conductor as much as I know. But it seems to have zero conductance from what I read on the multimeter. My question is: Why does it have zero conductance? Do I have to do a processing on the dispersion before it starts to be a good conductor?

Thanks in advance...
 

Attachments

  • graphene.jpg
    graphene.jpg
    4.9 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a conductor if there are gaps; you would need a continuous piece of graphene, or multiple pieces that are bonded together so that they conduct from one to the next.

Here is a commercial supplier, with some helpful notes:
https://graphene-supermarket.com/Conductive-Graphene-Dispersion-100.html
 
Thanks...
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top