Resistance of hollow copper cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the resistance of a hollow copper cylinder, defined by its outer and inner diameters, length, and the resistivity of copper. Participants are exploring the implications of geometry on resistance calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to calculate resistance using different methods, including subtracting resistances of full cylinders and considering the hollow section's area. Questions arise regarding the correct use of diameters versus radii and the implications of resistance additivity.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different calculation methods, with some participants suggesting that resistance should be treated as parallel conductors rather than additive. A few calculations have been presented, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the accuracy of unit conversions and the assumptions made in the calculations. The original poster references a book answer that differs from their calculations, prompting further scrutiny of the methods used.

Siune
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey!

We have a copper pipe, which has a outer diameter y = 4.1 mm and inner diameter x = 4.0 mm
Length of the pipe is L = 120m and resistivity of copper is ρ = 1.7 * 10^{-8}\Omega


Homework Equations


Resistance is R = ρ * \frac{L}{A}


The Attempt at a Solution


Now, I calculated the resistances for cylinders of diameter y and diameter x.
Then I subtracted the bigger from lower one and got:

R = 8*10^{-3} \Omega

But does the shape of the object matter? Don't we need just the area of the bottom of hollow cylinder?

A = \pi * ( r_1^{2} - r_2^{2} )

Using the area above, I get around R = 3.2 \Omega

I converted diameters to radius and mm to metres.

P.S. In back of my book the answer is R=0,8 \Omega
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer in the book is correct. Most likely you are not using the correct units. Show the details of your calculation.
 
I get 3.2 ohm when I calculate the resistance.

voko: did you use 4.1 mm and 4 mm as diameters or radii?
 
Admittedly, I (ab)used the data as radii :)
 
First option:

<br /> R = 1.7 * 10 ^{-8}\Omega m * \Big(\frac{120 m }{\pi * \big( \frac{0.004 m }{2} \big)^{2}} - \frac{120 m }{\pi * \big( \frac{0.0041 m }{2} \big)^{2}} \Big) = 7,822.. * 10^{-3} \Omega<br />

Second option:
<br /> R = 1.7 * 10 ^{-8}\Omega m * \Big(\frac{120 m }{ \pi \big( (\frac{0.0041m}{2})^{2} - (\frac{0.0040m}{2})^{2}} \Big) = 3.20667 \Omega<br />
 
Last edited:
Resistance is not additive. Think about total resistance of parallel conductors.
 
Ye, that's why option 1 seemed pretty weird to me.

I don't see tho how option 2 is about additivity of resistance. As I just calculated the (bottom) surface area of the hollow sylinder and then proceed to calculate the resistance?
 
Option 1 is the one one which assumes additivity of resistance. If you use resistance of parallel conductors instead, you should get the same as per option 2. I suggest that you do that symbolically.
 
Okey,

so we can divide the the bottom surface area to n amount of same size segments. Then they all have the same length L.

Now as they are parallel and each has resistance R_1 we get

R^{-1} = \big( \frac{n}{R_{1}}\big)

Now each segment has surface area

A_1 = \frac{\phi}{360}\Big(\pi \big( (\frac{y}{2})^{2} - ( \frac{x}{2} ) ^{2} \big ) \Big)

and then

R_1 = \frac{ρL}{\frac{\phi}{360}\Big(\pi \big( (\frac{y}{2})^{2} - ( \frac{x}{2} ) ^{2} \big ) \Big)}

Then as \frac{\phi}{360} = \frac{1}{n}

we get the

R = \frac{ρL}{\Big(\pi \big( (\frac{y}{2})^{2} - ( \frac{x}{2} ) ^{2} \big ) \Big)}

?
 
  • #10
What you did is puzzling. But the result is correct.
 
  • #11
option 1 is wrong you can not subtract the resistances of the 2 full cylinders to get the resistance of the hollow cylinder because the resistance of the large cylinder is equivalent to the hollow and small cylinders connected in parallel and not series. 1/Ry=1/Rh+1/Rx, which is your option 2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
23K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K