Resolution power of telescope lab (rayleigh criterion)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the resolution power of a telescope using the Rayleigh criterion, specifically in a lab experiment involving a sodium lamp and wire gauze. Participants clarified that the slit width should be recorded when the vertical wires just begin to disappear, emphasizing the importance of precision in measurements. The disappearance of the wires is attributed to the diffraction pattern where the central maximum coincides with the first minimum, causing light cancellation. To calculate the wavelength of light from the measurements, the formula Wavelength = (D x a)/x is recommended, where D is the distance from the gauze to the telescope, a is the slit width, and x is the distance between the wires.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Rayleigh criterion in optics
  • Familiarity with diffraction patterns and their characteristics
  • Basic knowledge of experimental physics and measurement techniques
  • Ability to perform calculations involving angular separation and wavelength
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of the Rayleigh criterion and its applications in optical systems
  • Learn about diffraction patterns and how they affect visibility in optical experiments
  • Study the relationship between slit width, distance, and wavelength in diffraction experiments
  • Explore advanced measurement techniques for improving accuracy in optical experiments
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, optical engineers, and anyone conducting experiments related to telescope resolution and diffraction patterns will benefit from this discussion.

jmher0403
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I have done a lab on resolution power of a telescope.
a wire gauze was placed infront of sodium lamp and i used a telescope with adjustable vertical slit to look at it.

i was bit confused with the theory ..

1) I was told to record the slit width when the vertical wires just cease to be seen.
Do I take the record when it starts to disappear or when it fully disappears? It was really hard to tell the point where the dissapearance started. Any suggestions as to get more accurate data?

2) why would the vertical wires of the gauze disappear? I know the central maximum coinciding with first minimum but what's it got to do with the wires?? Is it because the light sources between the gauze wires coming together (max + min) canceled out so that the vertical wires are hidden?

3) I measured the distance between wires (x)
distance between gauze and the telescope (D)
width of slit (a)

and have equation

angular separation α = λ/ahow would I get the wavelength from the measurements so that I can compare the values with the real wavelength of sodium lamp (590nm) to see the validity of my experiment?I tried drawing the light source diagram

and came up with tan(α) = x/D but when I do that, the wavelength I get is really off the true wavelength of 590nm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) When recording the slit width when the vertical wires just cease to be seen, you should take a very close look and try to record it as accurately as possible when the wires start to disappear. This might require some practice and patience but it will ensure that you get more accurate data.2) The vertical wires of the gauze disappear because the central maximum of the diffraction pattern coincides with the first minimum, causing the light sources between the wires to cancel each other out, making them appear hidden.3) To calculate the wavelength from your measurements, you can use the formula: Wavelength = (D x a)/x where D is the distance between the gauze and the telescope, a is the width of the slit, and x is the distance between the wires.By substituting in your values for D, a, and x, you should be able to get an estimate of the wavelength. You can then compare this to the true wavelength of the sodium lamp (590nm) to check the validity of your experiment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K