Resonance in a damped triangular potential well

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a mass in a damped triangular potential well, specifically examining the effects of a periodic driving force on the system's oscillation amplitude. The equation of motion is defined as m\ddot{x} = -k(u+\dot{x}) + f(T/2-t), where k and u are constants, and f represents the driving force. The participant proposes that a sawtooth profile force can induce resonance in a specific mass, leading to high amplitude oscillations, with the relationship f = \frac{uk^2}{m} governing the synchronization of the driving force with the mass's bouncing events. The discussion raises questions about the robustness of this system under realistic experimental conditions and the nature of the quality factor in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, particularly oscillatory motion.
  • Familiarity with differential equations and their applications in physics.
  • Knowledge of damping effects and their mathematical representation.
  • Experience with potential wells and their physical implications.
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the concept of quality factor in oscillatory systems.
  • Explore the effects of damping on resonance in mechanical systems.
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of periodic driving forces in oscillators.
  • Study the implications of air resistance on the motion of oscillating bodies.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mechanical engineers, and researchers interested in oscillatory systems, damping effects, and resonance phenomena in potential wells.

Irid
Messages
207
Reaction score
1
I have a potential well which is an infinite wall for x<0 and a linear slope for x>0. There is damping proportional to velocity. Basically, it's a ball bouncing elastically off the ground and with air friction included. I wonder if there is some periodic driving force which will cause one particular mass to bounce with a high amplitude and only slightly perturbe all the other masses (kind of a pseudo-resonance?).
My first attempt was to try a sawtooth profile force. The equation of motion is thus
[tex] m\ddot{x} = -k(u+\dot{x}) + f(T/2-t)[/tex]
where k and u are constants, T is the period of the driving force and fT/2 is the maximum force. The solution is parabolic in time. I figured that the driving force will sync up with bouncing events iff
[tex] f = \frac{uk^2}{m}[/tex]
and so, if I could produce a force with such a slope, only a very particular mass m will oscillate with a high amplitude (which itself depends on the period
[tex] x_0 = \frac{kuT^2}{8m}[/tex]
).
To sum up, my line of thought is this: I fix the slope f according to the parameters of my system. The period and driving force amplitude are then determined by my choice of oscillation amplitude x_0.
Could you verify these calculations? Also, would the particle readily sync up with the driving force? Would this system be robust enough to work in a realistic experiment with various perturbations etc.? What would be the equivalent of the quality factor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your equation. The periodicity you're searching for arises from the regular impulse the ball receives during its elastic collision with the ground, but I can't find a corresponding term in your equation of motion. I also don't believe the solution to an equation modelling a particle moving due to its own weight and air resistance is parabolic.
 
The equation is valid only for x>0. I don't include the delta-like force of the surface reaction, i just assume that whenever the particle arrives at x=0, its speed flips sign. My equation of motion is
[tex] x(t) = At^2 + Bt[/tex]
so the particle starts out at x=0 with speed B, moves up, comes down to x=0 at time T=-B/A with speed -B, and then flips back to the initial condition
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K