Rest Mass and Preferred Frame of Reference

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concepts of rest mass and the implications of reference frames in the context of Einstein's theory of relativity. Participants explore the relationship between rest mass, motion, and the existence of a preferred frame of reference, examining both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that if an object is at its rest mass, it should be considered perfectly stationary, suggesting a universally defined state of rest.
  • Others argue that observers do not agree on whether an object is at its rest mass, indicating the relativity of motion.
  • It is proposed that every object, regardless of speed, is "at its rest mass" to an observer moving at the same speed.
  • A participant questions whether the concept of rest mass implies a minimum force of gravitational attraction observed by inertial reference frames, suggesting a connection to absolute velocity.
  • Concerns are raised about whether the explanation of rest mass denies the principle of mass-energy equivalence.
  • Another participant responds that mass-energy equivalence relates primarily to rest energy and emphasizes that gravitational attraction is not dependent on absolute velocity, referencing the relativity principle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of rest mass and its implications for reference frames. The discussion remains unresolved, with differing interpretations of the relationship between rest mass, motion, and gravitational attraction.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of rest mass and motion, as well as unresolved implications of gravitational attraction in relation to absolute velocity.

nsh3a94
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Einstein's theory of relativity is based on the fact that all motion is relative, which precludes the existence of a universally defined state of rest (priviledged reference frame). Einstein also recognises the existence of rest mass. If an object were at its rest mass, wouldn't it be perfectly stationary; in a universally defined state of rest?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
nsh3a94 said:
If an object were at its rest mass, wouldn't it be perfectly stationary; in a universally defined state of rest?

Observers don't agree on whether an object is at its rest mass.
 
Every object, at any speed, is "at its rest mass" to an observer moving at the same speed.
 
bcrowell said:
Observers don't agree on whether an object is at its rest mass.

Wouldn't all inertial reference frames that are observing the force of gravitational attraction between themselves and an object accelerating in a direction opposite to its absolute velocity vector will register a minimum force of attraction at the same time, which would signal the object having reached its rest mass?
 
Last edited:
HallsofIvy said:
Every object, at any speed, is "at its rest mass" to an observer moving at the same speed.
Wouldn't this explanation deny the mass energy equivalence?
 
nsh3a94 said:
Wouldn't this explanation deny the mass energy equivalence?

Certainly not. That "the mass of a body is a measure of its energy-content" relates first of all to the rest energy, see:

- http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

Note about gravitational attraction: Everything was derived on the basis of the relativity principle, according to which no "absolute velocity vector" can be detected. The force of attraction is therefore not a function of speed in the way you perhaps think.

Harald
 

Similar threads

High School What if we use a non physical reference point to measure an object's mass?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
High School A difficulty with the equivalence of all inertial reference frames
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Undergrad Principle of relativity for proper accelerating frame of reference
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
10K
Undergrad What if one is in 1905 and debating foundational fundamentals?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Undergrad Galilean relativity in terms of homogeneity
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Undergrad About inertial reference frames and logical deduction
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Graduate Question about "Rest frame of a photon" FAQ
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
High School Confusion over relative velocities and reference frames
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad SR textbooks discussing accelerated reference frames without delving into GR
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Undergrad Special Relativity & No Special Inertial Frame of Reference
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K