Resultant Gamma after Einstein velocity addition

wil3
Messages
177
Reaction score
1
Hello. Let's say that I am in a frame in which I see a rocket traveling at v. This rocket then fires a projectile forward with velocity u in its rest frame.

I can find u' easily enough using the Einstein velocity addition formula. However, I recall seeing a version of the formula that uses gammas instead(ie, if \gamma is defined for v and \Gamma is defined for u, then there is some compact equation for \Gamma' purely as a function of the other two gammas)

Does anyone know this formula? It is proving very difficult to derive. Thanks very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you be thinking of the Relativistic Doppler Factor where you can just multiply them for multiple velocities?
 
Nah, I remember this came up in class on a problem of this exact sort. I seem to remember there being a \Gamma*\gamma term going on somewhere. But thanks for the analysis-- I'm sure there is a parallel with the Doppler Effect.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top