I Resulting force on a chamfered pneumatic piston

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces acting on a chamfered pneumatic piston, specifically how the chamfer affects the resulting force. It is established that the force on the piston is calculated using the formula F = P x a, where P is pressure and a is the area of the piston. The introduction of a chamfer increases the surface area but does not change the net downward force because the projected area remains the same. The conclusion is that the chamfer can effectively be ignored in calculations, as it does not alter the total force exerted by the pneumatic system. Overall, the impact of the chamfer on the force is negligible.
inkblotch
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
What happens to the resulting force in a pneumatic cylinder, if the piston inside were chamfered.
I was reading up on forces on hydraulic/pneumatic cylinders, and I've been thinking of this for a while:

So for a pneumatic cylinder, the force on the piston is simply:
P = F/a
F = P x a
where a = area of the piston that the air pressure is acting on.

So what would happen if the piston is chamfered, thus increasing the surface area?
pistons.png

See above, (red circles are o-rings). In a closed system, my guess is :
  1. The overall volume has increased, decreasing the pressure inside
  2. However, surface area is increased due to the chamfer
  3. Therefore the resulting downward force is the same.
Is this idea correct, or have I missed something?
Edit : The next step is, given the same air pressure, how could we estimate the increase in downward force?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The pressure acts normal to the surface, so the net effect of increased surface is zero (since only the downward component of pressure matters), and the product of downward component times area is the same as total pressure times projected area.
 
So it means the chamfer can just be ignored, since the projected area of the chamfer + the area of the flat surface is the same as just the area of the completely flat piston?
 
inkblotch said:
So it means the chamfer can just be ignored, since the projected area of the chamfer + the area of the flat surface is the same as just the area of the completely flat piston?
Yes
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top