Resulting force on a chamfered pneumatic piston

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter inkblotch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Piston Pneumatic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the forces acting on a chamfered pneumatic piston. The fundamental equation governing this is P = F/a, where F is the force, P is the pressure, and a is the area of the piston. The introduction of a chamfer increases the surface area but does not affect the net downward force, as the projected area remains constant. Thus, the chamfer can be disregarded when calculating the resulting force, as it does not contribute to an increase in downward force under constant air pressure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pneumatic cylinder mechanics
  • Familiarity with pressure-area-force relationships
  • Knowledge of chamfer geometry and its implications
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of surface area modifications on pneumatic systems
  • Learn about the principles of pressure distribution in hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders
  • Explore the effects of chamfering on mechanical components in engineering
  • Investigate methods for calculating projected area in complex geometries
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, mechanical designers, and students studying fluid mechanics or pneumatic systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on optimizing pneumatic cylinder performance.

inkblotch
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
What happens to the resulting force in a pneumatic cylinder, if the piston inside were chamfered.
I was reading up on forces on hydraulic/pneumatic cylinders, and I've been thinking of this for a while:

So for a pneumatic cylinder, the force on the piston is simply:
P = F/a
F = P x a
where a = area of the piston that the air pressure is acting on.

So what would happen if the piston is chamfered, thus increasing the surface area?
pistons.png

See above, (red circles are o-rings). In a closed system, my guess is :
  1. The overall volume has increased, decreasing the pressure inside
  2. However, surface area is increased due to the chamfer
  3. Therefore the resulting downward force is the same.
Is this idea correct, or have I missed something?
Edit : The next step is, given the same air pressure, how could we estimate the increase in downward force?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The pressure acts normal to the surface, so the net effect of increased surface is zero (since only the downward component of pressure matters), and the product of downward component times area is the same as total pressure times projected area.
 
So it means the chamfer can just be ignored, since the projected area of the chamfer + the area of the flat surface is the same as just the area of the completely flat piston?
 
inkblotch said:
So it means the chamfer can just be ignored, since the projected area of the chamfer + the area of the flat surface is the same as just the area of the completely flat piston?
Yes
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
690
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K