Reverse Composition to find composition of a derivative

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
12 replies · 6K views
ninfinity
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[tex] I\!f~ f(x+1)=\sqrt{x^2-2x}~~~and~~~g(x)=f(\!\sqrt{x})[/tex]
[tex] Find: g'(x-1)[/tex]

Homework Equations


In order to find [itex]g'(x-1)[/itex] I know the following steps have to be taken:
[tex] f(x+1) \rightarrow f(x) \rightarrow f(\sqrt{x}) = g(x) \rightarrow g'(x) \rightarrow g'(x-1)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Composing ##\sqrt{x}## into ##f(x)## isn't hard, given that I have ##f(x)##. Finding the derivative and then composing ##x-1## into that can also be done without much difficulty.
The only problem that I find myself coming across is how exactly to move from ##f(x+1)## to ##f(x)##. I don't remember any sort of formal equation of something like this, so I started just playing around with it.
I defined ##h(x)=x+1## so that my original equation becomes ##f(h(x))= \sqrt{x^2-2x}##.
Then I tried to logic out what had to be done to ##h(x)## to become ##f(h(x))##. First I decided it needed to be squared. $$h(x)^2 = (x+1)^2 = x^2+2x+1$$It also needs to be taken to a one-half power, but doing that would negate the square, and so something else needs to be happening under the radical.
So I tried $$\sqrt{h(x)^2-1}=\sqrt{(x+1)^2-1}=\sqrt{x^2+2x+1-1}=\sqrt{x^2+2x}$$
Unfortunately, that does not equal ##f(x+1)##.
I happen to be stuck here and cannot figure out how to move forward.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ninfinity said:

Homework Statement


[tex] I\!f~ f(x+1)=\sqrt{x^2-2x}~~~and~~~g(x)=f(\!\sqrt{x})[/tex]
[tex] Find: g'(x-1)[/tex]

Homework Equations


In order to find [itex]g'(x-1)[/itex] I know the following steps have to be taken:
[tex] f(x+1) \rightarrow f(x) \rightarrow f(\sqrt{x}) = g(x) \rightarrow g'(x) \rightarrow g'(x-1)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Composing ##\sqrt{x}## into ##f(x)## isn't hard, given that I have ##f(x)##. Finding the derivative and then composing ##x-1## into that can also be done without much difficulty.
The only problem that I find myself coming across is how exactly to move from ##f(x+1)## to ##f(x)##. I don't remember any sort of formal equation of something like this, so I started just playing around with it.
I defined ##h(x)=x+1## so that my original equation becomes ##f(h(x))= \sqrt{x^2-2x}##.
Then I tried to logic out what had to be done to ##h(x)## to become ##f(h(x))##. First I decided it needed to be squared. $$h(x)^2 = (x+1)^2 = x^2+2x+1$$It also needs to be taken to a one-half power, but doing that would negate the square, and so something else needs to be happening under the radical.
So I tried $$\sqrt{h(x)^2-1}=\sqrt{(x+1)^2-1}=\sqrt{x^2+2x+1-1}=\sqrt{x^2+2x}$$
Unfortunately, that does not equal ##f(x+1)##.
I happen to be stuck here and cannot figure out how to move forward.

You seem to be over-thinking on the problem. The first task as you said is to find f(x).

You have f(x+1). Replace x with something which can give you f(x).
 
Pranav-Arora said:
You have f(x+1). Replace x with something which can give you f(x).

I don't understand. Replace x with some arbitrary coefficient?
 
ninfinity said:
I don't understand. Replace x with some arbitrary coefficient?

No no. Replace x with something like x+k, which turns x+1 to x.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
No no. Replace x with something like x+k, which turns x+1 to x.

So...it would be something along the lines of f(x+k)=√x2-2x? I'm not making the connection.
 
ninfinity said:
So...it would be something along the lines of f(x+k)=√x2-2x? I'm not making the connection.

Replace x with x+k, you get ##f(x+k+1)=\sqrt{(x+k)^2-2(x+k)}##. What should be k if LHS is to be ##f(x)##?
 
I'll admit I was still a little confused by what you meant, so I decided to try out a few numbers first. At last I tried k=-1 and noticed that inside of the function, f(x+k+1) = f(x) if k=-1, are things like this true for all composition functions and the like?
 
ninfinity said:
I'll admit I was still a little confused by what you meant, so I decided to try out a few numbers first. At last I tried k=-1 and noticed that inside of the function, f(x+k+1) = f(x) if k=-1
Yes, k=-1 is the right choice. So what is ##f(x)## now?

are things like this true for all composition functions and the like?
Yes, they are.
 
Mark44 said:
This is obviously a calculus problem, so belongs in the Calculus & Beyond section. I am moving it there.

I apologize for that, since the question was focusing on the algebra of the problem I thought it was best suited for the precalculus section.

Pranav-Arora said:
Yes, k=-1 is the right choice. So what is f(x) now?

$$f(x)=\sqrt{x^2-4x+3}$$
 
ninfinity said:
$$f(x)=\sqrt{x^2-4x+3}$$

That's correct. You have f(x) now, do the remaining part.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
That's correct. You have f(x) now, do the remaining part.

Then it follows that
$$f(\sqrt{x})=\sqrt{x-4\sqrt{x}+3}=g(x)$$
$$g'(x)=\frac{\sqrt{x}-2}{2\sqrt{x^2-4\sqrt{x^3}+3x}}$$
$$g'(x-1)=\frac{\sqrt{x-1}-2}{2\sqrt{(x-1)(x+2)-4\sqrt{(x-1)^3}}}$$

Those last two functions need to be simplified still further . The problem I am having, however, is that each time I go about this I seem to end up going in circles. I've been thinking about trying to factor using fractional exponents, but I'm not sure if that would get me somewhere useful. Any advice?
 
ninfinity said:
Then it follows that
$$f(\sqrt{x})=\sqrt{x-4\sqrt{x}+3}=g(x)$$
$$g'(x)=\frac{\sqrt{x}-2}{2\sqrt{x^2-4\sqrt{x^3}+3x}}$$
$$g'(x-1)=\frac{\sqrt{x-1}-2}{2\sqrt{(x-1)(x+2)-4\sqrt{(x-1)^3}}}$$

Those last two functions need to be simplified still further . The problem I am having, however, is that each time I go about this I seem to end up going in circles. I've been thinking about trying to factor using fractional exponents, but I'm not sure if that would get me somewhere useful. Any advice?

I don't see any terribly useful ways to simplify those. Why do you think you have to simplify?
You could factor a (x-1) out of the terms in the radical in the denominator of the second form but that really doesn't look all that much simpler.
 
Last edited: