How to Determine N from Refraction Angles and Constants?
- Context: Undergrad
- Thread starter GabrielCoriiu
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Engineering Refraction Reverse
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around determining the index of refraction (N) from given angles of incidence (I), refraction (R), and a constant (k) using Snell's law. Participants explore the implications of surface orientation on refraction and the relationships between angles and vectors in this context.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant seeks to reverse engineer refraction to find N using the relationship sin(θ1)/sin(θ2) = k.
- Another participant suggests defining angles θ1 and θ2 in a conventional manner for clarity.
- A participant questions the relevance of the normal vector in the context of Snell's law.
- One participant rephrases the question to focus on the surface orientation needed for the refracted ray to focus on a specific point.
- Another participant asserts that parallel light rays remain parallel after refraction, questioning the need for focusing.
- A participant realizes a relationship involving cos(θ1 - θ2) and unit vectors, indicating a potential method to solve for θ1 using Snell's law.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the relevance of the normal vector and the concept of focusing in refraction. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific conditions and definitions needed to determine N.
Contextual Notes
There are limitations in the clarity of angle definitions and the assumptions regarding the behavior of light rays during refraction. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of Snell's law and its application.
Similar threads
- · Replies 11 ·
- · Replies 15 ·
- · Replies 6 ·
- · Replies 11 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 14 ·
##\qquad## !