Reversing Order of Integration for Double Integral Problem

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
emelie_earl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
8yv6i.png


My idea was that the limits are
BrQKm.png


and that the anti-derivative of dy was

xlog(1+y^2)

but that seems wrong...

maybe use these limits instead
YKvJd.png


and start with dx?

gives us
rDFwG.png


then we take dy

rgKWx.png


guess, i figured it out eventually with the help of wolfram with the last integration
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
emelie_earl said:
8yv6i.png








My idea was that the limits are
BrQKm.png


and that the anti-derivative of dy was

xlog(1+y^2)

but that seems wrong...
Yes, it is wrong. It is standard "Calculus I" mistake to treat a function of the variable as if it were just the variable but you should be past that by the time you are doing multiple integrals. "[itex]1/(1+ y^2)[/itex]" is NOT the same as [itex]1/y[/itex] and its anti-derivative is not a logarithm. The anti-derivative of [itex]1/(1+ y^2)[/itex] is [itex]arctan(y)+ C[/itex]. That's a standard anti-derivative that you should have memorized.

maybe use these limits instead


YKvJd.png


and start with dx?

gives us
rDFwG.png


then we take dy

rgKWx.png


guess, i figured it out eventually with the help of wolfram with the last integration
Yes, reversing the order of integration is the best way to handle this one. Integerating [itex]arctan(1)- arctan(x^2)= \pi/4- arctan(x^2)[/itex] is likely to be very difficult!