Revisiting Algebra / Any Good Books to Help Master it?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced in mastering algebra, particularly for students engaged in intermediate math classes like calculus and differential equations. Users express a need for resources that can help refresh and perfect their algebra skills, as mistakes in this area hinder their performance. Recommendations include the book "Algebra" by Gelfand, which emphasizes intuition and understanding over rote memorization, as well as "Trigonometry" by Gelfand for those needing a better grasp of trigonometric concepts. The importance of practice through exercises is highlighted as essential for mastery. Overall, the conversation underscores the necessity of solidifying algebra foundations to succeed in higher-level mathematics.
CarbonWater
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I've been doing the intermediate math classes like calculus and differential equations. I'm doing okay, but not great. What holds me back getting a 100% in these classes is almost always the algebra. I make stupid algebra mistakes and honestly am not completely comfortable with some concepts.

Does anyone know of any books or guides or approaches that are tailored to people trying to refresh / perfect their algebra? I feel like I almost need to approach it a different way to master it at this point.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
CarbonWater said:
I've been doing the intermediate math classes like calculus and differential equations. I'm doing okay, but not great. What holds me back getting a 100% in these classes is almost always the algebra. I make stupid algebra mistakes and honestly am not completely comfortable with some concepts.

Does anyone know of any books or guides or approaches that are tailored to people trying to refresh / perfect their algebra? I feel like I almost need to approach it a different way to master it at this point.

Are you talking about algebra as in arithmetic or algebra as in group-theory based algebra?
 
chiro said:
Are you talking about algebra as in arithmetic or algebra as in group-theory based algebra?

Considering the fact that he is talking about algebra used calculus of diff. equations, I would say that it's likely to be elementary algebra. In that case, I highly recommend Algebra, Gelfand. Also, if you're looking for a better intuition of trigonometry, try Trigonometry, Gelfand.

The above two books really focus on intuition and understanding as opposed to memorizing algorithms, and are also very challenging.
 
Make a lot of exercises. It's the only way to master these things!
 
DivisionByZro said:
Considering the fact that he is talking about algebra used calculus of diff. equations, I would say that it's likely to be elementary algebra. In that case, I highly recommend Algebra, Gelfand. Also, if you're looking for a better intuition of trigonometry, try Trigonometry, Gelfand.

The above two books really focus on intuition and understanding as opposed to memorizing algorithms, and are also very challenging.

Thanks for the suggestion and you were correct about which type of algebra I'm talking about.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top