Revolutionize Crash Safety: 90 Ton Impact Absorber for Cars

  • Thread starter Thread starter KYLE007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact
AI Thread Summary
A new impact absorption system has been developed that can withstand forces up to 90 tons, utilizing 300 units that each handle 300 kg of force. The system operates by engaging two units at a time, allowing for gradual deceleration during impacts. This technology could potentially enhance crash safety by being integrated into a vehicle's crumple zone, increasing impact time and reducing force on occupants. However, there are concerns about the effectiveness of using multiple shock absorbers in series under sustained force. Overall, the concept presents a promising advancement in automotive safety technology.
KYLE007
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

I have been working with materials that can absorb huge impacts.

I have recently succesfully created a system that can absorb 4 tons of
force acting against it. With a little work around this I can largly increase
force absorbing capabilities to 90 tons without major reconstruction and
weight increase to the system.

The concept of this system is very basic:

The system has 300 units that can each withstand 300kg's of force.
It operates on only 2 units at a time so once both units become
exausted impact is tranfered to the next 2 units and so on.

My question is... can this help assist with crash safety technology?
Perhaps it could be incorperated into the crumble zone of a car, it does
not weigh much. The fact that there is many units could mean that impact time is
increased and therefor deceleration is gradual.

Your thoughts and opinions will be grealy appriciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are it's dimensions?
 
width can be anything

height = approx. 80mm

length = approx. 600mm
 
kg and tons are not units of force, and if you have any force for an extended period of time (there is no time given at all here?), putting several shock absorbers in series won't help: They all get the full force.

Perhaps it could be incorperated into the crumble zone of a car, it does
not weigh much. The fact that there is many units could mean that impact time is
increased and therefor deceleration is gradual.
That zone does exactly what you describe.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top