Riemann Zeta approaches infinity as x approaches 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter pndc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Riemann
pndc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




We know \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^x} is uniformly convergent on the interval x\in(1,\infty) and that its sum is called \zeta(x). Proof that \zeta(x) \rightarrow \infty as x \rightarrow 1^+.


Homework Equations



We cannot find the formula that \zeta is given by, but we know
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^1} diverges.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've already shown that the functional series is uniformly convergent on the above interval and that the derivative also converges uniformly to a limit function, thus \zeta(x) is continuous and can be differentiated.

The solution seem quite apparent: As x approaches 1, the series will approach the harmonic series, and thus it will diverge. Given any M>0, I can find a b>0 so that x \in (1,1+b) \Rightarrow \zeta(x) >M, as we know that we will approach the harmonic series.

However, I'm not quite sure how I can go about formulating a formal proof. For functional series, I suppose I cannot just plug in the limit and say its a harmonic series (especially as it's not defined there).

Under which conditions can I be completely sure that plugging in the relevant x and then let n approach infinity will be equivalent to letting n approach infinity and then let x approach infinity? Or can I approach this in a different way?

Any help will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not use the fact that
$$
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}
$$
is a harmonic series.

Then
$$
1+\frac{k}{2}\leq\sum_{n=1}^{2^k}\frac{1}{n}
$$
as ##k\to\infty##
$$
\infty = 1+\frac{k}{2}\leq \sum_{n=1}^{2^k}\frac{1}{n}
$$
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top