Rigid Bodies and rotatational motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a static equilibrium problem involving a sign and a rod, where the tension in a support cable needs to be calculated. The sign weighs 400 N and is suspended at the end of a 4.00 m rod weighing 500 N, with the cable making a 40-degree angle with the rod. Participants emphasize the importance of considering torque in the problem, specifically calculating clockwise and counterclockwise torques around the point where the rod connects to the wall. The correct setup involves analyzing vertical forces and torque to find the tension in the cable. Ultimately, the solution requires equating the torques to solve for the unknown tension.
in10sivkid
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
yea...i'm having trouble today with my HW lol

a sign weighing 400 N is suspended at the end of a uniform rod 4.00 m weighing 500 N. what is the tension in the support cable if it makes an angle 40 with the rod?

now I'm curious i don't think Tclockwise = Tcounterclockwise comes into play

so i thought of this as a typical static equilibrium problem, but there is only 1 unknown that is the T in the cable that needs to be broken up into a vector

so exactly how does this get setup then

sum of Fx = Cos40F1 = 500 N + 500 N?
sum of Fy = Sin40F1 = 500 N + 400 N?

i know i am missing something
 
Physics news on Phys.org
help please?
 
in10sivkid said:
yea...i'm having trouble today with my HW lol

a sign weighing 400 N is suspended at the end of a uniform rod 4.00 m weighing 500 N. what is the tension in the support cable if it makes an angle 40 with the rod?

now I'm curious i don't think Tclockwise = Tcounterclockwise comes into play

so i thought of this as a typical static equilibrium problem, but there is only 1 unknown that is the T in the cable that needs to be broken up into a vector

so exactly how does this get setup then

sum of Fx = Cos40F1 = 500 N + 500 N?
sum of Fy = Sin40F1 = 500 N + 400 N?

i know i am missing something

Torque does come into play in this problem. There are forces acting where the rod is connected to the wall that are unkown in addition to the tension being unknown. Draw a free body diagram for the rod.
 
Last edited:
so curious would the summation of the forces in the y direction be

Sin40T + F1 (force rod is connected to the wall) = 400 N + 500 N
and but then the sum of the torque is getting me mixed up

if i choose the point where the rod is connected to the wall as the axis of rotation do I include Sin40T as well?


...also I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly how to setup the Torque if i do that...some help would be great
 
in10sivkid said:
so curious would the summation of the forces in the y direction be

Sin40T + F1 (force rod is connected to the wall) = 400 N + 500 N
and but then the sum of the torque is getting me mixed up

if i choose the point where the rod is connected to the wall as the axis of rotation do I include Sin40T as well?


...also I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly how to setup the Torque if i do that...some help would be great

Forget what I said (and deleted) about not needing the torque. It would apply only to a massless rod. Your equation for the vertical forces is correct. Choosing the point of contact of the rod and wall for the axis of rotation leaves you with three forces to consider for the torque calculation. This is the only equation you need. You would need the equation you wrote if you wanted to find the force the wall applies to the rod.

Calculate two clockwise torques: (1) the 400N sign at distance 4m and (2) the 500N weight of the rod at distance 2m (the center of the rod). Calculate the counterclockwise torque: the vertical component of tension Tsin40 at 4m. Equate the clockwise torques to counterclockwise torque and solve for T.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top