Rindler Observer: Unruh Effect & Spacetime Geometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter pythagoras88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Observer
pythagoras88
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I read sean carroll book, "spacetime and geometry" and in the last chapter where he tries to derive unruh effect, he introduced the concept of Rindler coordinate.

There is this part where he considers an accelerating observer in minkowski metric and introduce the trajectory blah blah. My question is, since the observer is accelerating, there must be some sort of fuel or energy propelling, so this energy by itself will actually result in curvature in the spacetime manifold. So isn't the consideration of accelerating observer in minkowski space invalid??

Thanks in advance for any response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The observer is supposed to be a 'test particle,' i.e. one who's mass is small enough that its own gravitational field is negligible.
 
oh, ok... haha... i guess it is a trivial question. So it is juest an accelerating particle that does not affect the spacetime.

Initially i was thinking, because an accelerating observer will have an rindler horizon given by x=t and x=-t. Then is it possible that the energy used to accelerate the particle cause a curvature in spacetime such that it create an event horizon. Then maybe this event horizon may actually coincide with the rindler horizon.

Anyway, Thanks for the reply.
 
The Rindler space-time isn't curved in the sense of having a non-zero curvature tensor.

My rather vague understanding of the Unruh effect is that, although the Rindler and standard space-times are both flat, the coordinates are different. And while they both have time translation symmetries, the time translation symmetry represented by the t coordinate in the Minkowski space is different from the time translation symmetry represented by the coordinate t' in the Rindler space, because the coordinates are different. This results in concepts of energy (which result from Noether's theorem - every time translation symmetry corresponds to a conserved energy) which are different in the two spaces.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top