Ripley's Believe it or Not? Dont believe it

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter VashtiMaiden
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and credibility of solving a 20x20 Rubik's Cube, as presented in a linked video. Participants explore the methods of solving Rubik's Cubes of various sizes, express skepticism about the claims made in the video, and share personal experiences with different cube sizes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express doubt about the authenticity of the 20x20 Rubik's Cube solve, questioning the methods used in the video.
  • Others believe there is a method to solving larger cubes, suggesting that techniques from smaller cubes could be adapted, though they find the idea of solving a 20x20 cube unappealing.
  • A participant mentions that solving a 20x20 cube is more challenging due to the absence of a center piece, which complicates the solving process.
  • Some participants share personal anecdotes about their experiences with smaller cubes, indicating varying levels of skill and interest in solving them.
  • There are claims that all Rubik's Cube solutions are algorithmic, implying that the solving process may not be as impressive as it seems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus, with multiple competing views on the credibility of the video and the methods of solving larger Rubik's Cubes remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the time commitment required to master larger cubes, with differing opinions on the appeal and practicality of solving such complex puzzles.

VashtiMaiden
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Science news on Phys.org
The truth is..I really don't know if I'll believe it or what.
 
That may take a while to master
 
There is a method to solving a Rubix cube. I tend to believe that this is real. I think in 4 hours, though, my head would explode.
 
There's a method to solving the 3x3 version I know that I'm sure with a bit of work could be applied to 20x20, although why you would want to is beyond me, how boring would that be to do?
 
undrcvrbro said:
That may take a while to master

while? for me, It would take Decades!
 
VashtiMaiden said:
while? for me, It would take Decades!
I'd probably give up after the first decade.

Schrödinger's Dog said:
There's a method to solving the 3x3 version I know that I'm sure with a bit of work could be applied to 20x20, although why you would want to is beyond me, how boring would that be to do?
I think that's the real question isn't why someone would want to, but WHO would want to?
 
Pfft, what a load of crap. Notice how the computer showed you which rows and columns were moved, just really fast? He just memorized that and undid it.
 
Yeah, its real, my friend gets sub-minute ones on his 3 by 3 and can do a 5 by 5 in about 5 mins. The thing is, being 20 by 20 there is no center, which makes it much harder. In fact he just ordered an 11 by 11.
 
  • #10
none of this is impressive, all of these are solved algorithmically
 
  • #11
undrcvrbro said:
I'd probably give up after the first decade.

1st decade..? maybe..I'm already dead..o:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
12K
Replies
20
Views
14K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K