Rise of Liquid from Horizontal Acceleration

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between vertical and horizontal acceleration in a liquid-filled container, referencing Halliday & Resnick's Physics. A scenario is proposed involving an inverted L-shaped rod and a mass on a string to explore whether the string would hang vertically under acceleration. The concept of plumb bobs being perpendicular to liquid surfaces is examined, questioning the observations of a moving observer. The conversation hints at the complexities of understanding acceleration in a fluid context. Overall, the thread seeks clarification on the dynamics of acceleration and its effects on liquid behavior.
Ben2
Messages
37
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
"Consider the horizontal acceleration of a mass of liquid in an open container. Acceleration of this kind causes the liquid surface to drop at the front of the tank and to rise at the rear. Show that the liquid surface slopes at an angle \theta with the horizontal, where tan \theta = a/g, a being the horizontal acceleration."
Relevant Equations
p = p_0 + \rho gh
The only way I get this is to make a the vertical acceleration at the bottom corner and g the horizontal acceleration there. This is from Halliday & Resnick's Physics. I've been unable to find anything there or in REA's Physics Problem Solver. Thanks for any hints submitted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose I attached an inverted L-shaped rod to the side of the accelerated container and suspended a string with a mass tied at the other end. Would the string hang vertically? If not, why not? Now consider the well known fact that masses at the ends of strings, a.k.a. plumb bobs are perpendicular to free surfaces of liquids. Would an observer moving as one with the liquid and the plumb bob see anything unusual? Do you see where this is going? If not, follow the link that was posted above just before I posted this.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and MatinSAR
Ben2 said:
The only way I get this is to make a the vertical acceleration at the bottom corner and g the horizontal acceleration there.
Consider the case a=0.
Are you sure you are taking ##\theta## as the angle to the horizontal?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K