RMS displacement of a diatomic atom

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the temperature at which the root mean square (rms) displacement of a diatomic atom reaches 5.0×10−10 m, given a spring constant of k = 4.0×10−3 N/m. The relevant equations include the average energy and internal energy equations, which relate temperature to the energy of the system. The participant initially assumes the atom behaves as a diatomic non-rigid rotator and considers modeling it as a classical harmonic oscillator. They recognize the need to connect the oscillator's energy to its amplitude and rms displacement. Ultimately, the calculated temperature for the specified displacement is 72 K.
Erubus
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A hypothetical atom is diatomic containing two identical atoms separated by an equilibrium distance. About this distance the atoms vibrate with the electric forces providing an effective spring constant of k = 4.0×10^−3 N/m. As the temperature of the sample is increased the amplitude of the vibration increases. At what temperature will the rms displacement of the atoms be x= 5.0×10−10m? (Answer: 72 K)


Homework Equations


<E> = 7kT/2

U = 7nRT/2


The Attempt at a Solution



I assumed that because of spring like nature of the atoms, this atom was a diatomic non rigid rotator, which is how I have those relevant equations. I am unsure if this initial assumption is even correct. Even if it was, I still don't have an idea of how to proceed from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems that you need to be modelling the bond as a harmonic oscillator. I imagine also that this should be considered as a classical oscillator, and not quantum mechanical. Then, you need to take out your classical mechanics textbook and figure out the relation between the energy of the oscillator and the amplitude of the oscillation, which will be related to the rms displacement ##\sqrt{\langle x^2 \rangle}##.
 
Got it, thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top