Rodrigues' rotation formula from SO(3) comutator properties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving Rodrigues' rotation formula using the properties of SO(3) groups and commutators. The formula is expressed through the matrix exponential involving the spin operator \(\hat{\vec{S}}\) and the unit vector \(\vec{n}\). Key insights include the use of quaternion algebra for a purely algebraic derivation and the adjoint action of quaternions to facilitate the rotation representation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of associative products when expanding exponentials in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SO(3) group properties and commutators
  • Familiarity with matrix exponentials and spin operators
  • Knowledge of quaternion algebra and its applications in 3D rotations
  • Basic concepts of vector calculus, including cross and dot products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Rodrigues' rotation formula using quaternion algebra
  • Learn about the adjoint action of quaternions in 3D rotations
  • Explore the characteristics of noncommutative associative algebras
  • Investigate the relationship between matrix exponentials and rotation representations in physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and computer scientists interested in 3D graphics, robotics, and any field requiring rotation transformations and their mathematical foundations.

sergiokapone
Messages
306
Reaction score
17
Is any way to get Rodrigues' rotation formula from matrix exponential
\begin{equation}
e^{i\phi (\star\vec{n}) } = e^{i\phi (\vec{n}\cdot\hat{\vec{S}}) } = \hat{I} + (\star\vec{n})\sin\phi + (\star\vec{n})^2( 1 - \cos\phi ).
\end{equation}
using SO(3) groups comutators properties ONLY like
\begin{equation}\hat S_k\hat S_j-\hat S_j\hat S_k=i\varepsilon_{kjl}\hat S_l,\qquad \hat S^2=2\hat I ?\end{equation}
where ##\vec{n} = (n_x,n_y,n_z)^{\top}##, ##\vec{n}^2 = 1##, and
\begin{equation}\label{}
(\vec{n}\cdot\hat{\vec{S}}) = \star\vec{n} =
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & -n_z & n_y \\
n_z & 0 & -n_x \\
-n_y & n_x & 0 \\
\end{pmatrix},
\end{equation}

\begin{multline}\label{}
\hat{\vec{S}} =
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & i \\
0 & -i & 0 \\
\end{pmatrix}
\vec{e}_x
+
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 0 & -i \\
0 & 0 & 0 \\
i & 0 & 0 \\
\end{pmatrix}
\vec{e}_y
+
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & i & 0 \\
-i & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 \\
\end{pmatrix}
\vec{e}_z =
\hat{S}_x \vec{e}_x +
\hat{S}_y \vec{e}_y +
\hat{S}_z \vec{e}_z
.
\end{multline}

References: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis–angle_representation#Exponential_map_from_so(3)_to_SO(3)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem you will run into is that you will be expanding a commutator action [when you exponentiate] and that's not associative. [You want to work with an associative product when expanding an exponential.]

For a purely algebraic derivation you can work it through most easily (imnsho) utilizing quaternion algebra. You have to be aware that in that algebra you must act adjointly (left action yields the spinor representation).

I suggest working with quaternions in scalar+3-vector format. The quaternion product then manifests as:
(a+\mathbf{u})(b+\mathbf{v}) = ab+a\mathbf{v}+b\mathbf{u} -\mathbf{u}\bullet\mathbf{v}+\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{v} where ##\times## is the cross product and ##\bullet## the dot product.

The adjoint action is:
R_{\theta,\mathbf{u}} \mathbf{v} = e^{\theta\mathbf{u}/2} \mathbf{v}e^{-\theta\mathbf{u}/2}
where ##\mathbf{u}## is a unit vector in the direction about which you rotate ( 👎 right hand rule). The exponential of a pure quaternion is then a version of the Euler formula as ##\mathbf{u}^2 = -1##:
e^{\theta\mathbf{u}/2} = \cos(\theta/2)+\mathbf{u}\sin(\theta/2) Work out the adjoint action of this on ##\mathbf{v}## and play with your vector product identities and half-angle trig. identities and the Rodigues' formula will pop right out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sergiokapone
There is an analog of the binomial theorem for noncommutative associative algebras. It is quite useful when the commutator assumes a special form. However, it’s not strictly necessary in this case - for so(3), it’s simple enough just to use the characteristic polynomial ##\mathbf{[x]_\times^3}+\mathbf{|x\|^2[x]_\times}=0## to compute the exponential.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MisterX and jambaugh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K