Rotated Section - Moment of Inertia

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the moment of inertia for a rotated 2D area, specifically seeking a formula for the inertia moments (Ix, Iy, Pxy) after rotating the area around the origin by a certain angle. The original poster, Eduardo, is looking for a method to determine these values without changing the axis of rotation. A participant suggests that rotating the area can be treated as a negative rotation of the axes, implying that the existing formulas for inertia moments can still be applied. This indicates that the same calculations can be utilized by simply adjusting the angle of rotation accordingly. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between area rotation and axis rotation in moment of inertia calculations.
eriveraa80
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody:

I can see that there are formulas to calculate the moment of inertia of a 2D Area (Second moment of area) here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_moment_of_area"

In the same link, there is a formula to calculate the Inertia moments about a ROTATED AXIS (Axis Rotation). But, is there a formula to calculate the Inertia moments of a ROTATED SECTION (rotated area) ??

Thanks in advance.
Eduardo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what you mean. Can you provide additional explanation by means of a diagram or other hand waving?
 
Ok, i will explain a little bit:

1. You have a 2D Area in a XY axis. You can calculate the Moments of Inertia Ix, Iy, Pxy.
2. You rotate the 2D Area around the origin, with a tetha angle.
3. So, known Ix, Iy, Pxy and tetha: Is there a formula so i can calculate the new Ix, Iy, Pxy around the same axis?

In wikipedia, you can see that there is a way of calculating the Ix', Iy' and Pxy' around the rotated axis, but that is not what i want, because i am not rotating Axis. I am rotating only the 2D Area and i want calculate Ix, Iy, Pxy in the same axis based on the previously Ix, Iy, Pxy calculated.

Any ideas?
 
Hello Eduardo, you should not create duplicate posts in different sections.

Can you see that rotating the area in one direction is the same thing as rotating the axes in the other direction?

So you should use the same formulae, but the rotation angle is negative.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top