Rotation of the plane of polarization of light by glucose

AI Thread Summary
Glucose solutions can rotate the plane of polarization of light due to their circular birefringence, which arises from the chiral nature of glucose molecules. This means that left-handed and right-handed circularly polarized light travel at different speeds within the solution. The rotation angle of the polarized light depends on the frequency of the light, as the phase difference between the two polarizations accumulates differently based on their respective refractive indices. When white light passes through glucose and is viewed through a polarizing filter, certain frequencies are transmitted while others are blocked, resulting in a spectrum of colors. This phenomenon highlights the relationship between molecular structure and optical properties in chiral substances.
greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Hi guys,

Online I found this really cool experiment that uses a glucose solution(e.g. in a beaker) to rotate the plane of polarization of a polarized light beam passing through it, of an angle ##\theta## which depends on the frequency of the EM wave.
Then, for example, watching white light emitted from a monitor(polarized white light) through the beaker containing glucose, with a polarizing filter, allows you to watch the white beam split into a certain frequency of the visible spectrum depending on how you tilt the filter.

Hence, I wanted to ask you why do glucose molecules cause this rotation of EM waves, depending on frequency? I know this has something to do with the shape of the molecules, but online I couldn't find much and I would really appreciate a detailed explanation of the phenomenon :)

Greg
 
Science news on Phys.org
 
  • Like
Likes greg_rack and Motore
Nice question! There's a property of an optically active medium called birefringence, which just means that the refractive index of the medium depends on how the light is polarised.

A glucose solution exhibits circular birefringence, where left-handed and right-handed circularly polarised light propagate with different speeds. This sort of birefringence occurs when the sample contains net non-zero amount of molecules of a certain chirality [(D) or (L)]; chirality is just a fancy way of saying that if you reflect the molecule in a mirror then you can't superimpose it on the original molecule. For example glucose is chiral because it contains a number of carbon atoms each of which are connected to four distinct groups.

For a plane EM wave traveling along the ##z## axis you can generally write the electric field as ##\mathbf{E}(z,t) = \mathcal{Re} \left[(a \hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + b \hat{\boldsymbol{y}})e^{i(kz - \omega t)} \right]## where ##a## and ##b## are the complex amplitudes (##a = a_0 e^{i \phi_x}##, ##b = b_0 e^{i \phi_y}##) in the ##x## and ##y## directions.

First you have a linearly polarised wave from the polariser (that is, ##\phi_x = \phi_y##), for which without loss of generality you can just take ##\mathbf{E}(z,t) = \mathcal{Re} [(A \hat{\boldsymbol{x}}) e^{i(kz - \omega t)}]## for some real number ##A##. You can write this equivalently as the sum of two oppositely circularly polarised (##\phi_y = \phi_x \pm \frac{\pi}{2}##) waves,$$\mathbf{E}(z,t) = \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[ A(\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} ) e^{i(k_1 z - \omega t)} \right] + \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[ A(\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} - i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} ) e^{i(k_2 z - \omega t)} \right]$$Outside of the circularly birefringent material you'll have ##k_1 = k_2 = k = n \omega / c##, but once the light passes into the material ##n_1 \omega / c = k_1 \neq k_2 = n_2 \omega / c##, if the two refractive indices are ##n_1## and ##n_2##. In other words, the two waves begin to accumulate phase with increasing ##z## at a relative rate of ##\frac{\omega}{c} (n_2 - n_1) := \frac{\omega \Delta n}{c}##. If you let ##\xi## be the distance the light has traveled in the medium (i.e. let ##z = z_0 + \xi##, where ##z_0## is the coordinate of the start of the material), then the change in relative phase over this distance will be ##\delta(\xi) := \frac{\omega \xi \Delta n}{c}##. So the equation of the electric field on the other side of the material is the sum of two contributions with a relative phase ##\delta(L)## (abbreviated ##\delta##),
$$
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{E}(z,t) &= \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[ A(\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} ) e^{i(kz - \omega t)} \right] + \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[ A(\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} - i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} ) e^{i(kz - \omega t)} e^{i\delta} \right] \\ \\

&= \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[Ae^{i (kz - \omega t + \frac{\delta}{2})} \left( (\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} )e^{-\frac{i \delta}{2}} + (\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} - i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} )e^{\frac{i \delta}{2}} \right) \right] \\ \\

&= \mathcal{Re} \left[Ae^{i (kz - \omega t + \frac{\delta}{2})} \left(\frac{e^{\frac{i \delta}{2}} + e^{-\frac{i \delta}{2}}}{2} \hat{\boldsymbol{x}} - \frac{e^{\frac{i \delta}{2}} - e^{-\frac{i \delta}{2}}}{2} i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)\right] \\ \\

&= \mathcal{Re} \left[Ae^{i (kz - \omega t + \frac{\delta}{2})} \left( \cos{\frac{\delta}{2} } \hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + \sin{\frac{\delta}{2} } \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)\right] = \mathcal{Re}[(A \hat{\boldsymbol{n}})e^{i(kz - \omega t+ \frac{\delta}{2})}]
\end{align*}
$$where ##\hat{\boldsymbol{n}} = \cos{\frac{\delta}{2}} \hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + \sin{\frac{\delta}{2}} \hat{\boldsymbol{y}}## is the unit vector obtained by rotating ##\hat{\boldsymbol{x}}## anti-clockwise by ##\delta / 2##. In other words, the plane of polarisation has tilted by an angle ##\delta / 2##!

Because ##\delta \propto \omega##, the angle by which the plane of polarisation tilts depends on the frequency of the light passing through the glucose. If you observe with white light incident on crossed polars, then those particular frequencies which have their polarisation angle tilted by a multiple of ##\pi## will pass through the glucose un-rotated, so are not transmitted through the analyser (which is at ##\frac{\pi}{2}## to the polariser). The colour seen is then the so-called "complementary colour", which you can determine by looking at the Michel-Levy chart.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes greg_rack and vanhees71
greg_rack said:
Hi guys,

Online I found this really cool experiment that uses a glucose solution(e.g. in a beaker) to rotate the plane of polarization of a polarized light beam passing through it, of an angle ##\theta## which depends on the frequency of the EM wave.
Then, for example, watching white light emitted from a monitor(polarized white light) through the beaker containing glucose, with a polarizing filter, allows you to watch the white beam split into a certain frequency of the visible spectrum depending on how you tilt the filter.

Hence, I wanted to ask you why do glucose molecules cause this rotation of EM waves, depending on frequency? I know this has something to do with the shape of the molecules, but online I couldn't find much and I would really appreciate a detailed explanation of the phenomenon :)

Greg

Condon's paper is a classic:

https://journals.aps.org/rmp/pdf/10.1103/RevModPhys.9.432

In essence, the optically active molecule needs to be asymmetric.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes greg_rack, vanhees71 and etotheipi
etotheipi said:
Nice question! There's a property of an optically active medium called birefringence, which just means that the refractive index of the medium depends on how the light is polarised.

A glucose solution exhibits circular birefringence, where left-handed and right-handed circularly polarised light propagate with different speeds. This sort of birefringence occurs when the sample contains net non-zero amount of molecules of a certain chirality [(D) or (L)]; chirality is just a fancy way of saying that if you reflect the molecule in a mirror then you can't superimpose it on the original molecule. For example glucose is chiral because it contains a number of carbon atoms each of which are connected to four distinct groups.

For a plane EM wave traveling along the ##z## axis you can generally write the electric field as ##\mathbf{E}(z,t) = \mathcal{Re} \left[(a \hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + b \hat{\boldsymbol{y}})e^{i(kz - \omega t)} \right]## where ##a## and ##b## are the complex amplitudes (##a = a_0 e^{i \phi_x}##, ##b = b_0 e^{i \phi_y}##) in the ##x## and ##y## directions.

First you have a linearly polarised wave from the polariser (that is, ##\phi_x = \phi_y##), for which without loss of generality you can just take ##\mathbf{E}(z,t) = \mathcal{Re} [(A \hat{\boldsymbol{x}}) e^{i(kz - \omega t)}]## for some real number ##A##. You can write this equivalently as the sum of two oppositely circularly polarised (##\phi_y = \phi_x \pm \frac{\pi}{2}##) waves,$$\mathbf{E}(z,t) = \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[ A(\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} ) e^{i(k_1 z - \omega t)} \right] + \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[ A(\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} - i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} ) e^{i(k_2 z - \omega t)} \right]$$Outside of the circularly birefringent material you'll have ##k_1 = k_2 = k = n \omega / c##, but once the light passes into the material ##n_1 \omega / c = k_1 \neq k_2 = n_2 \omega / c##, if the two refractive indices are ##n_1## and ##n_2##. In other words, the two waves begin to accumulate phase with increasing ##z## at a relative rate of ##\frac{\omega}{c} (n_2 - n_1) := \frac{\omega \Delta n}{c}##. If you let ##\xi## be the distance the light has traveled in the medium (i.e. let ##z = z_0 + \xi##, where ##z_0## is the coordinate of the start of the material), then the change in relative phase over this distance will be ##\delta(\xi) := \frac{\omega \xi \Delta n}{c}##. So the equation of the electric field on the other side of the material is the sum of two contributions with a relative phase ##\delta(L)## (abbreviated ##\delta##),
$$
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{E}(z,t) &= \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[ A(\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} ) e^{i(kz - \omega t)} \right] + \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[ A(\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} - i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} ) e^{i(kz - \omega t)} e^{i\delta} \right] \\ \\

&= \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{Re} \left[Ae^{i (kz - \omega t + \frac{\delta}{2})} \left( (\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} )e^{-\frac{i \delta}{2}} + (\hat{\boldsymbol{x}} - i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} )e^{\frac{i \delta}{2}} \right) \right] \\ \\

&= \mathcal{Re} \left[Ae^{i (kz - \omega t + \frac{\delta}{2})} \left(\frac{e^{\frac{i \delta}{2}} + e^{-\frac{i \delta}{2}}}{2} \hat{\boldsymbol{x}} - \frac{e^{\frac{i \delta}{2}} - e^{-\frac{i \delta}{2}}}{2} i \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)\right] \\ \\

&= \mathcal{Re} \left[Ae^{i (kz - \omega t + \frac{\delta}{2})} \left( \cos{\frac{\delta}{2} } \hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + \sin{\frac{\delta}{2} } \hat{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)\right] = \mathcal{Re}[(A \hat{\boldsymbol{n}})e^{i(kz - \omega t+ \frac{\delta}{2})}]
\end{align*}
$$where ##\hat{\boldsymbol{n}} = \cos{\frac{\delta}{2}} \hat{\boldsymbol{x}} + \sin{\frac{\delta}{2}} \hat{\boldsymbol{y}}## is the unit vector obtained by rotating ##\hat{\boldsymbol{x}}## anti-clockwise by ##\delta / 2##. In other words, the plane of polarisation has tilted by an angle ##\delta / 2##!

Because ##\delta \propto \omega##, the angle by which the plane of polarisation tilts depends on the frequency of the light passing through the glucose. If you observe with white light incident on crossed polars, then those particular frequencies which have their polarisation angle tilted by a multiple of ##\pi## will pass through the glucose un-rotated, so are not transmitted through the analyser (which is at ##\frac{\pi}{2}## to the polariser). The colour seen is then the so-called "complementary colour", which you can determine by looking at the Michel-Levy chart.
Brilliant! Thanks man, appreciate it :)
 
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top