Rotation of wheel between two non-slip surfaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the velocities of a wheel positioned between two translating surfaces, with Point P moving left at 6 m/s and Point Q moving right at 3 m/s. The radius of the wheel is 0.3 m. The velocity at the center of the wheel is determined to be -1.5 m/s in the x-direction, while the velocity at Point B is calculated as -1.5i - 4.5j. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding relative motion and the non-slipping condition of the wheel on the surfaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and relative velocity concepts
  • Familiarity with angular velocity calculations
  • Knowledge of non-slip conditions in rolling motion
  • Basic proficiency in vector mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of relative velocity in rigid body dynamics
  • Learn about angular velocity and its relationship with linear velocity
  • Explore the effects of non-slip conditions on rolling objects
  • Practice problems involving multiple frames of reference in motion
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rolling motion and relative velocity analysis.

Brian in Twisp
Messages
3
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A certain machine can be modeled as a wheel between two translating bodies. Point P is on the upper translating body and is moving to the left at 6m/s and Point Q is on the lower translating body and is moving to the right at 3 m/s. The radius of the wheel is .3m. Find the velocity at the center of the wheel and velocity at point B. Assume that the wheel is not slipping on the translating bodies (I didn't get the translating bodies labled on the diagram, but they are the two surfaces that the wheel is between.
Snapshot2.jpg

Homework Equations


Vc = r ω
VB = V0 + Vrel + ω x r

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the relative velocity between two different frames equations, I got the velocity of the center at -3m/s i, but I my answer for the velocity of B wasn't correct, and I'm not sure where I'm erring.
My interpretation is: Since the wheel is not slipping, the point of contact is moving at the same velocity as the translating body. Looking at the upper body, P is moving at -6m/s. This should be equivalent to a wheel rolling on a fixed plane at 6m/s, ω = 6/-0.3 or 20 radians/second counterclockwise.
So I'm getting a velocity of B = -3i -6j

The problem is in a unit focusing on the kinematics of motion of solid bodies between two different frames.
For full disclosure, the problem was on a quiz that I passed, but missed this question. The instructor doesn't release solutions because people can take the test at different times.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you take the +ve direction to be "to the right" then point P is moving at -3m/s wrt point Q.
Which part of the wheel has the same velocity as point P?

Note:
My interpretation is: Since the wheel is not slipping, the point of contact is moving at the same velocity as the translating body.
... get a round object and roll it along the floor ... observe the point of contact between the object and the floor: what speed is the object at that point? Is that the same as the speed of the object?
In your problem, the floor also happens to be moving ... so take your round object (a can is good for this) and put it between two flat objects (large books say) and move them about. Put the can on the floor, put a book on top of it, move the book ... how far does the can move, relative to the floor, compared to the book?

Watch and learn.
 
Simon Bridge said:
If you take the +ve direction to be "to the right" then point P is moving at -3m/s wrt point Q.
Do you mean -9m/s?

Anyway I also disagree with your first answer of -3m/s for the motion of the center. Please show your work on that part.
 
Sry yes. The rest stands.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Note: ... get a round object and roll it along the floor ... observe the point of contact between the object and the floor: what speed is the object at that point? Is that the same as the speed of the object?
Brian's statement was that the point of contact (presumably meaning the point on the wheel at the point of contact) is moving at the same speed as the "translating body", i.e. (Based on the terminology in the problem description) the flat surface with which it is in contact. I see no flaw in that.
 
Neither do I.
I want OP to watch something roll and use the observations to understand the problem better.
 
Brian in Twisp said:
This should be equivalent to a wheel rolling on a fixed plane at 6m/s
That would be true if the centre of the wheel were not moving: upper plane moving left at 6m/s, centre of wheel static, would be the same as upper plane static, wheel rolling along underneath it as 6m/s to the right. But the centre of the wheel is moving.
 
So looking at the problem assuming both the point of contact on the top and the bottom are stationary with respect to their respective surfaces, and the relative motion between P and Q is -9m/s. Assigning p and q add the respective points of contact, I can then use the relative velocities to calculate the angular velocity with V=ω x r taking r as the distance (0.6m) from q to p. Therfore ω=15.
Now knowing ω, I can go back and, using q as my instantaneous point of zero velocity, calculate the relative velocity of the center at q-4.5i or restated back in the original frame is -1.5i. By the same logic the velocity at point B is -1.5i -4.5j.
This fits with what I saw when I rolled a couple round things across the counter under a book, and saw the wheel moving half the distance, and thus half the speed of the book.
I think I got it now, thank you all. But please let me know if I said something Thai doesn't make sense.
Brian
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: haruspex and Simon Bridge

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K