Rotational Inertia of a Ball-Rod system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational inertia of a ball-rod system, where a cylindrical rod is attached to a ball, and the system pivots from a vertical position. The moment of inertia is initially miscalculated, leading to confusion about how to incorporate the ball's mass and distance from the pivot point. A participant suggests treating the ball as a point mass at the end of the rod, with its effective distance from the pivot being 43.5 cm. The correct formula for the moment of inertia includes contributions from both the rod and the ball, clarifying the setup's dynamics. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexities of rotational motion and the importance of accurately defining the system's parameters.
Dtails
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cylindrical rod 32.2 cm long has mass
0.919 kg and radius 1.54 cm. A 8.89 kg
ball of diameter 11.3 cm is attached to one
end. The arrangement is originally vertical
with the ball at the top and is free to pivot
about the other end.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s2 .
After the ball-rod system falls a quarter
turn, what is its rotational kinetic energy?
Answer in units of J.
At the same point, what is its angular speed?

Homework Equations


K=.5Iw^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I=1/3mL^2+2/5mR^2Alright, I'm on the second part of the problem, having gotten the energy part. I cannot, however, for the stupid life of me, define this Ball-Rod system's moment of inertia in a fashion that gets me a reasonable answer. I'm wondering if I'm just missing something. If somebody could help me see it I can get the rest no problem.

I also set it up in a way that it was just the rod with a big mass on the end of it, and that failed miserably. And I searched the forum for a similar problem, but the guy doing it had already found moment of inertia and didn't want to share.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I=1/3mL^2+2/5mR^2

Welcome to PF.

Isn't the sphere a point mass at the end of the rotating rod? It is not actually rotating about the center of the sphere is it?

Won't its distance be at 43.5 cm?
 
Sorry, but I got it. I believe the solution I used was 1/3mL^2+2/5mR^2 + MD where M is mass of the sphere and D is the distance from it to the center of the sphere. It does seem counter intuitive, but the way the system's set up is that it APPEARS the sphere is rotating as its moving with the rod. If you hold a ball and put a big X on the side facing you, and then move it in a way that its face never changes direction, when it's to another side, it has 'rotated' away from you.

The concept's very abstract and I don't even see the validity in it, but the equation worked on a hunch. Blarg.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top