Rotational Kinematics of Running

AI Thread Summary
To determine the number of revolutions a diver makes when jumping from an 8.3m cliff with an average angular speed of 1.6 rev/s, the correct approach involves using the equation s = ut + 0.5at², where the initial speed (u) is 0 and acceleration (a) is -9.8 m/s². This calculation shows that the time to fall 8.3m is approximately 1.3 seconds, not 0.85 seconds as initially assumed. Consequently, the diver would complete about 2.08 revolutions during the fall, correcting the earlier miscalculation. The mistake stemmed from incorrectly assuming constant speed rather than accounting for acceleration due to gravity. Understanding these kinematic equations is crucial for accurately solving rotational motion problems in free fall.
MetalCut
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi
I need some help.
The question is:

At the local swimming hole, a favourite trick is to run horizontally of a cliff that is 8.3m above the water. One diver runs off the edge of the cliff, tucks into a ball and rotates on the way down with an average angular speed of 1.6rev/s. Ignore air resistance and determine the number of revolutions she makes on the way down.

Now I've done it like this but the anser is wrong...


∆Ө = 1.6rev[(2 pie rad) ÷ (1 revolution)] = 10.05 radians
Well, gravity pulls her down at 9.8m/s². So in the first second she will fall 9.8m.
She only needs to fall 8.3m to the water.
So 8.3m ÷ 9.8m = 0.85s
It will take her only 0.85s to reach the water.
And she makes 1.6rev/s.
So 1.6 ÷ 100 = 0.016
Then 0.016 x 85 = 1.36
Thus she will make 1.36 revolutions on her way down.

What am i missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
9.8ms^-2 means that the body will achieve the velocity of 9.81ms^-1 in a second, not 9.81m.
I think the equation, s=ut+0.5at^2 should be used instead.
 
You are assuming her speed was a constant 9.8 m/s which is not true.
As Harmony said, use s= ut+ 0.5at^2. Here u (initial speed) is 0 and a (acceleration) is -9.8. Since she is diving down 8.3 m, -8.3= -(0.5)(9.8)t^2.
 
Thanx alot, i don't know how i could have made such a stupid mistake...

Thanx
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top