RSA Encryption: Finding Primes to Make Decryption Difficult

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zurtex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Encryption Primes
Zurtex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
1
I'm working on encrypting a small message using RSA. Are there any types of primes or primes of particular property that would make RSA decryption particularly difficult?

Furthermore are there any better ways that just randomly trying to factorise to break RSA encryption or is there some particularly good way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check here,
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2213

RSA is getting weaker by the day. There are algos like Elliptic Curve Factorisation and pollards rho techniques (this is getting modified by the day to give more and improved pollard rho techniques ... ). Impressive isn't it ?? once the most hardest encryption system is losing ground ... (People are now reverting to Diffie Hellman and El-Gamal these days ... as u can see from the PGP system)

Check here for,
Elliptic Curve Factorisation :
http://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM
(brilliant java piece)

Check here for,
Pollard Rho techniques :
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PollardRhoFactorizationMethod.html
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/PollardsRhoMethod.html

-- AI
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow! Thanks, I don't have to worry too much as I am a Freshmen who is far more into maths than any of my fellow class mates, so with a bit of luck the only algorthm they'll use to test for primes is the very traditional brute force.

The program is very impressive, it can factorise quicker than MATLAB can multiply the factors.

I’m still a little unsure about RSA though, will I be factorising pq or (p-1)(q-1)? Still grappling with the understanding the theory a bit (mind you I’m reading several weeks ahead of the lectures so no big deal yet).

Edit: Dosn't really matter, I'll read it all up. Thanks again :smile:
 
Last edited:
If you want to decode it without knowing the keys you will factorise pq since it is public (p-1)(q-1) is not public.
I'm in the Ib diploma program and I'm thinking of writing an extended essey about RSA. Do you have any tips?
/Andreas
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top