Ruins of 7,000-year-old city found in Egypt oasis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A team of US archaeologists has uncovered the ruins of a city in Egypt's Fayyum oasis, dating back to the Neolithic period between 5,200 and 4,500 BC. The discovery was made using electromagnetic surveys, revealing a network of walls and roads reminiscent of Greco-Roman construction. The city remains buried under sand, and further details about the site will be disclosed later. This find adds to the understanding of early agricultural societies, similar to other notable Neolithic sites like Ban-Po in China and Harappa in the Indus River Valley, which also date back to the same era and highlight the development of early farming cultures.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,358
Reaction score
7,187
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080129/wl_mideast_afp/egyptarchaeology

CAIRO (AFP) - A team of US archaeologists has discovered the ruins of a city dating back to the period of the first farmers 7,000 years ago in Egypt's Fayyum oasis, the supreme council of antiquities said on Tuesday.

"An electromagnetic (presumably GPR) survey revealed the existence in the Karanis region of a network of walls and roads similar to those constructed during the Greco-Roman period," the council's chief Zahi Hawwas said.

The remnants of the city are "still buried beneath the sand and the details of this discovery will be revealed in due course," Hawwas said.

The remains date back to the Neolithic period between 5,200 and 4,500 BC!

Pretty cool.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
There are a lot of Neolithic agricultural "city" sites, Ban-Po is the most famous, in China. They all date between 5000 and 7000BCE. Most of them were millet growing cultures, not rice.
 
The Indus River Valley civilization is another interesting one. Search Harappa on google for more information, there's a bunch of research going into these historical sites, fascinating stuff.
 

Thread 'Songs that pay homage to deceased artists, no covers'

There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the plural for moose not meese?'

The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top