Public Opinion on Russell's Paradox & Beyond 10 Dimensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tommy122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Russell's Paradox and its relation to theoretical dimensions, particularly the concept of an 11th dimension connecting two infinite points in the 7th dimension. Participants express skepticism about the feasibility of discussing such complex mathematical ideas without a solid understanding of calculus. There are reminders about forum guidelines against overly speculative theories, emphasizing the need for mathematical grounding in these discussions. One participant humorously critiques the complexity of the ideas presented, while another reinforces the importance of adhering to established mathematical principles. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of discussing advanced theoretical concepts without adequate mathematical knowledge.
Tommy122
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
What do you guys think about Russels Paradox compared to our possible 10 dimensions where do you think that 11th one is? How do you think this would relate to a trans-dimensional wormhole? Obviously I know what the answers are I'm just wondering what the public thinks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My idea is that you would have to have two infinite points (7th dimension) with a line (11th dimension) connecting those two infinite points.
 
1. How are you able to deal with all of this when, in another thread, you appear to not even know calculus yet? All these "dimensions" are very complex mathematical description. One can't possibly even BEGIN to know what these are without a lot of mathematics.

2. In our Guidelines, there is a very clear policy of overly speculative personal theory. You might want to make sure you re-read and understand what you have agreed to before proceeding any further. We enforce our policy.

Zz.
 
I'm sorry, but if you read my other post correctly I am currently learning Calculus. I am sorry for not reading that certain section, I will re-read.
 
Tommy122 said:
My idea is that you would have to have two infinite points (7th dimension) with a line (11th dimension) connecting those two infinite points.

I think you are wrong on this. Russel's paradox clearly indicates, using the principal value theorem of Emmy Noether's (cousin) that it can only be an even-valued prime number over 5. :bugeye:

(just adding to the gibberish...)

Seriously, now. ZapperZ is right.
 

Thread 'Need help understanding particle physics and quantum physics'

So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
View full post »

Similar threads

I What is the smallest possible state change in the Universe?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Time Travel Paradox: Can It Happen?
Replies
11
Views
5K
I Is "nondimensionalization" a misnomer?
Replies
19
Views
2K
B The Fourth Dimension: A Measurement of Aging
Replies
20
Views
3K
B I can't understand more than 3 spatial dimensions
Replies
6
Views
3K
I Bell's spaceship paradox unknown? Interpretation?
Replies
20
Views
2K
I Time travel is a fact or fiction.?
Replies
9
Views
3K
I Twin Paradox Time Dilation in Positively Curved Universe
Replies
24
Views
2K
I FTL Travel: The Matryoshka Paradox
Replies
6
Views
2K
B 4th spatial dimension thought experiment
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top