Ruthenium Battery Prototype: A Breakthrough or a Secret?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BatteryNut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery Prototype
AI Thread Summary
Researchers at the University of Tokyo have developed a ruthenium-based battery prototype that reportedly outperforms lithium-ion batteries, retaining nearly 96% of its charge over months. The prototype, comparable in size to a standard laptop battery, successfully powered an electric car motor for hours without overheating, unlike traditional lithium-ion systems. Despite its promising capabilities, there is limited information available, raising questions about why the technology remains under wraps. Concerns about the rarity and cost of ruthenium, priced around $300 per troy ounce, may hinder mass production. The battery functions as a metal-hydride system rather than a fuel cell, suggesting potential for further development.
BatteryNut
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ruthenium and its ability to absorb hydrogen somehow was made into a battery prototype by some researchers at the University of Tokyo. It was demonstrated to hold a charge better than lithium ion batteries with nearly 96% retention of the incoming charge over a period they claimed reached months. The size of the prototype was equal to that of a standard laptop battery, yet in a small battery bank series powered an electric car motor at full speed for hours. I thought this would have been world news by now, yet there is silence.

Does anyone have more info? Can somebody out there get some more info out of Tokyo if you have access to this technology? Why is it being kept "under wraps"? It did not seem to overheat as the lithium ion storage method does. What would be difficult about producing more than a prototype of a ruthenium based battery?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What would be difficult about producing more than a prototype of a ruthenium based battery? Cost probably, ruthenium is rare and very useful for many things.

"It was demonstrated to hold a charge better than lithium ion batteries ..." What about energy density?

"its ability to absorb hydrogen somehow" Is it a fuel cell?

Why is it being kept "under wraps"? I doubt that it is.

"a small battery bank series powered an electric car motor at full speed for hours."

With what sort of load?

I'm having some trouble finding a good hit about this (search engines keep giving this page 1st), but I did get you the price of ruthenium, ~ $300 per troy ounce.
 
Last edited:
Also, you should note the word 'series.'
That means it's more than just a lab-top battery sized object powering this motor.
 
"its ability to absorb hydrogen somehow" Is it a fuel cell?
It's not a fuel cell, but a metal-hydride battery, as in Li-metal hydride.

I'm sure the developers are not ready to release information on it. If one has a really advanced technology, then one usually keeps key characteristics as trade secrets, unless the technology is patented.
 
Todays Spot Price, Ruthenium: bid=270, ask=305 dollars per troy ounce. A bit pricey.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top