Rutherford Scattering: Inverse Relationship Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the inverse relationship between target-to-detector distance and scattering angle in Rutherford scattering, noting that the subtended solid angle decreases with distance squared, while the differential cross section remains constant. Alpha particles are preferred over beta particles in these experiments due to their greater mass and fixed energy emissions, which lead to less scattering by electrons in the target. The kinetic energy of alpha particles is significantly higher than that of beta particles, enhancing their interaction with heavy nuclei. Additionally, the penetrating power of charged particles is influenced by their mass and kinetic energy, further favoring alpha particles. Overall, the conversation highlights the advantages of using alpha particles for effective nuclear scattering experiments.
Mr Bean
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain why there is an inverse relationship between target to detector distance and scattering angle?

Thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
If the detector has a fixed size, then the subtended solid angle varies inversely as target-to-detector-distance squared. But dσ/dΩ is the differential cross section per sterad, and is independent of target-to-detector distance. Is this what you mean?

Bob S
 
hii.. i would like to know why alpha particles are more suited for this experiment than beta particles?

thxx :)
 
adil0311 said:
hii.. i would like to know why alpha particles are more suited for this experiment than beta particles?
Beta particles are very easily deflected (scattered) by electrons in the target, while the alpha particles are deflected only by the heavy nuclei. Furthermore, there are no radioactive sources that emit betas with fixed energy (because the decay energy is shared with anti-neutrinos), while radioactive alpha emitters emit fixed energy alphas.

Furthermore, the distance of closest approach of a charged particle to the nucleus is inversely proportional to the kinetic energy of the incident charged particle, and the kinetic energies of alpha particles from radioactive sources are ~ 3 or 4 times the energies of beta sources. See

http://ads.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/bbrowse?book=hsaa&page=312

Look up impact parameter and distance of closest approach in

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/rutsca2.html

Bob S
 
Hi.. thanks loads for your reply.. much clearer now.

I was also thinking in terms of penetrating power of the beta particle since it is much less massive than the alpha particle. It could be that beta particle will not pass through the atom so easily. Does that make any sense?
PS: I am only an A level student.. my scientific language is not so much developed yet. lol.

Thanks again
Adil
 
adil0311 said:
I was also thinking in terms of penetrating power of the beta particle since it is much less massive than the alpha particle. It could be that beta particle will not pass through the atom so easily. Does that make any sense?
The penetrating power of a charged particle is proportional to ½Mv2/Zz where ½Mv2 is the projectile kinetic energy (in MeV) and Zz are the charges of the target and projectile. The kinetic energy of alpha particles is several times larger than betas, and the alpha particle z is twice the beta z. There is also an effect due to the sign of the projectile charge.

Use online software for alpha scattering in http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/rutsca2.html

At much higher energies (over 100 MeV), electrons have proven to be very effective in mapping nuclear sizes.

Bob S
 
that was great! Thanks a lot!:)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top