Ryerson University Aerospace Engineering: Compare to U of T

  • Thread starter Thread starter vipulan12
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Ryerson University offers an aerospace engineering program, but its reputation and academic standing are often compared to the University of Toronto (UofT), which has a well-regarded Engineering Science program. While UofT is recognized for its strong aerospace engineering curriculum, Ryerson's program is also valid since all accredited engineering schools must meet certain educational standards. The discussion highlights the limited availability of aerospace engineering programs in Canada, as many institutions focus on mechanical, chemical, or civil engineering instead. Concerns about job prospects for Ryerson graduates in aerospace engineering are addressed, with reassurance that attending Ryerson does not preclude future employment opportunities in the field. Overall, while rankings can provide some insight, they may not fully reflect the quality or suitability of a program for individual needs.
vipulan12
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Is ryerson university a good place for aerospace engineering?
how is it compared to the university of Toronto?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vipulan12 said:
Is ryerson university a good place for aerospace engineering?
how is it compared to the university of Toronto?

Would you have to do the slush crawl? I'm afraid I can't comment on the academic merits.
 
I don't know about Ryerson's Engineering program. UofT's Aerospace engineering is part of EngSci and EngSci is pretty famous in Canada.

Its really hard to compare. So don't take the link seriously.
http://forums.studentawards.com/yaf_postst30778_Is-Ryerson-University-good-for-aerospace-and-civil-engineering-.aspx
 
If a school is licensed to teach engineering it must offer what you want.

I haven't seen many universities in Canada which offer programs like aerospace engineering. Usually they offer mech., chem., civil and the like. Automotive and aerospace are not wide spread.

You can always look at the rankings, but does that really tell you what you want to know?

So will going to Ryerson mean that you won't be able to get a job in the future? No.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top