How Can Fault Tree Analysis Estimate Risk in Hydrocarbon Separation Processes?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on using Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) to estimate risk in hydrocarbon separation processes, specifically regarding the separation of water from hydrocarbons. The conversation highlights the importance of control loops and alarm systems, with a focus on the conversion of a cause tree into a fault tree. Key elements include the application of AND and OR gate logic, as well as the fractional dead time formula for testing alarm systems. Participants share their attempts at solving the problem and seek validation for their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
  • Knowledge of control systems and alarm mechanisms
  • Familiarity with probability calculations in risk assessment
  • Proficiency in using the fractional dead time formula
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Fault Tree Analysis in depth
  • Learn about control loop design and implementation
  • Research alarm system reliability and testing methodologies
  • Explore advanced probability theory applications in risk management
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, risk analysts, and safety professionals involved in hydrocarbon processing and risk assessment methodologies will benefit from this discussion.

Gundam404
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


FIGURE 2 shows an improved arrangement for separating water from the hydrocarbon liquid for the process in question 2. Two simple level control loops, LC, have been added to regulate flow control valves on a pumped system. Extra protection is also provided in the form of high level alarms, LA, one to each side of a baffle plate fitted in the tank. It has been determined that estimating the probable frequency of hydrocarbon passing to the water drain will permit judgement as to whether this would be an acceptable risk. FIGURE 3 is the cause tree for this TOP event, showing the conventional 'AND' and 'OR' gates together with typical fail-to-danger fault frequencies for the control and alarm equipment, including estimates for electricity and instrument air failure. Also shown are probabilities (3%) for operator failure to respond to the alarm system which is rated at 97% reliable.
upload_2018-12-2_13-25-25.png
(a) Complete the conversion of this cause tree into a FAULT tree, allowing for testing the alarm system once per week. (Use the simple fractional dead time formula.)
upload_2018-12-2_13-24-37.png


Hello,

I have attempted this question with several different outcomes. I have picked this answer currently and was wondering if anyone could please check it for me. All equations used are from the university literature but I feel like my numbers are wrong somewhere. Any help in the correct direction is appreciated.

Many thanks.

Homework Equations


AND gates are multiplied together.
OR gates are added together.
Fractional dead time (fdt) = 1/2 x T x F
T = Test Interval
F = Failure rate

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2018-12-2_13-28-47.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-2_13-24-37.png
    upload_2018-12-2_13-24-37.png
    21.2 KB · Views: 722
  • upload_2018-12-2_13-25-25.png
    upload_2018-12-2_13-25-25.png
    11.8 KB · Views: 661
  • upload_2018-12-2_13-28-47.png
    upload_2018-12-2_13-28-47.png
    19.9 KB · Views: 600
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you have any luck with this? as I'm currently struggling with this exact question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K