Satellites, Orbits and Gravitational Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total mechanical energy of two satellites in a circular orbit around Earth before and after a collision. The total mechanical energy before the collision is derived using gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy formulas, resulting in a value of approximately -6.34 billion joules. After a completely inelastic collision, the total mechanical energy remains the same, but the kinetic energy needs to be recalculated. Participants highlight the importance of correctly interpreting the orbital radius and the nature of kinetic energy, emphasizing that it is always positive. Clarifications on these points are crucial for accurate calculations and understanding of the problem.
lu6cifer
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Two satellites, A and B, both of mass m = 110 kg, move in the same circular orbit of radius r = 7.45 x 10^6 m around Earth but in opposite senses of rotation and therefore on a collision course.

(a) What is the total mechanical energy EA + EB of the two satellites + Earth system before the collision?

(b) If the collision is completely inelastic so that the wreckage remains as one piece of tangled material (mass=2m), what is the total mechanical energy immediately after the collision?




U = -GMm/r
K = -GMm/2r



Total E = U + K

U is the Earth system's energy, K is the satellites' energy
There are 2 satellites for (a), so I figure m = 2m
r is radius of Earth + radius of orbit

E = -GMm/2r
E = -GM(2)m
E = -6.67e-11 * 5.98e24 * 2(110) / (6.38e6 + 7.54e6)
E = -6344939986 J

For part (b), since m also equals 2m, I also get
-6344939986 J


Is there anything wrong? Because my online thing isn't accepting my answer...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have several things wrong here.
  1. K = -GMm/2r
    Kinetic energy, 1/2mv2, is always positive.
  2. 6.38e6 + 7.54e6
    Your problem statement indicates r=7.54e6 meters is the orbital radius, not the orbital altitude. Which is correct?
  3. For part (b), since m also equals 2m, I also get -6344939986 J
    What is the kinetic energy after the collision?
 
Thanks---Your hints worked!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top