Scanners and Optics Explained: Mirrors, Lens & CCD Array

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mhdeia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the optical components of scanner heads, specifically focusing on the role of mirrors, lenses, and CCD arrays. Participants explore the design and functionality of these optical elements, as well as the implications for resolution and field of view in scanning applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the design of scanner lenses, questioning if they resemble a "large slice" and how they achieve high resolution and a large field of view.
  • Another participant describes the scanner lens as a "D" shaped glass lens that focuses light reflected from the scanned surface onto a CCD or photodiode array, facilitating line-by-line image construction.
  • A participant raises concerns about the quality and resolution of scanner lenses compared to expensive objective lenses used in microscopy, questioning the effects of aberrations and diffraction.
  • Another participant clarifies that scanner lenses do suffer from aberrations, but these may not be noticeable due to the scanning method and the cylindrical lens design, which aligns each pixel with the optical axis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the impact of aberrations in scanner lenses compared to microscope lenses, and there are differing views on the implications for resolution and image quality.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the limitations of scanner optics in terms of resolution and aberration effects, but do not resolve the complexities of these issues or provide definitive answers regarding the performance of different lens types.

mhdeia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all!
I am really rconfused about the optical part of a scanner head. :frown:
I read that it consists of mirrors, a lens and the ccd array. But how this lens looks like? Is it like a large slice? Do really exist such lenses? How can such a lens have so good resolution and so large field of view (that the scanner needs to move only to one direction!)

Any information about the scanner's optics will be appreciated :-) because until now I have found almost nothing...

THX!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi there
welcome to PF :)

what do you mean my a "large slice" ?

a scanner lens particularly in something small like a handheld scanner is nothing more than a glass "D" shaped lens a few centimetres or so long

Light is shone down onto the paper to be scanned light is reflected from the paper and focussed by the lens into the long narrow CCD or photodiode array.
As this is scrolled across the page the sensor ( photodiodes/CCD strip) detect the variations in light and dark areas and it builds up a picture line by line

Optical character recognition software can then be used to detect text and display it appropriately

Dave
 
a quick drawing for you, something like this...


attachment.php?attachmentid=52284&stc=1&d=1351129109.gif


cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • scanner.gif
    scanner.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 753
Thank you very much davenn :smile:
Large slice.. actually I mean like a rod, like the one that draw.
Well, it's a bit strange for me that you can have such a good quality and resolution with that type of lens, whereas when you want to see something smaller (~ 3um resolution) you have to use an expensive objective lens (with a lot of elements inside to correct aberrations etc)... Lenses for scanner don't suffer from aberrations and diffraction effects?

For example in laboratory we used the pathscan enabler IV scanner to see a microscope slide and it had resolution ~ 5 microns without the use of an objective lens.
 
No, they suffer from aberrations just like anything does. You just can't tell because you aren't magnifying anything like you are with a microscope or telescope. Also because the lens is a cylindrical lens (or something like that) and each pixel is at the optical axis of the lens. In a normal telescope or microscope you want to capture an area all at once, not have to scan the scope around to move the image across the pixels, so you have a square or rectangular chip. (With some exceptions) So in essence you actually have a very very tiny field of view, only 1 pixel across, but it is as long as the lens is. And it takes thousands of exposures each time you scan a page and combines them into one picture.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K