Schroedinger boundry equation: Smooth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShamelessGit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Smooth
ShamelessGit
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I tried to solve a time independent schroedinger equation with a finite potential well today by solving it in 3 pieces, one for in the box and 2 for the outsides. By setting the equations equal to each other where they met at the edges of the box, by setting the integral of everything squared = 1, and by setting the integral of the exponential functions to the right and left equal to each other (I figured it made sense for them to by symmetrical), I was able to write all the constants equal to 1 other constant, which I could set equal to a function involving energy. I don't like this because it looks as though the constants and energy could vary infinitely, but energy is supposed to be quantized. It seems intuitive to make it a smooth function, but I don't ever remember being taught that one is supposed to do that. I tried making it smooth and it looks as though I get convenient answers.

1. Is it appropriate to solve the Schrodinger equation in pieces like this?

2. Is it good to make it smooth?

3. An unrelated question: Is there also a corresponding time dependent equation? I'm familiar with separation of variables, and the full Schrodinger equation makes it look as if there should always be a time dependent solution, and if there's not, then the total energy E is equal to 0. When, if ever, is there a wave-function that is independent of time?

4. Is there anything else I missed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Is it appropriate to solve the Schrodinger equation in pieces like this?
The equation is true at every point in space. If it helps to solve different regions separately (which is usually the case in these examples), just do that.

2. Is it good to make it smooth?
It should have a second derivative everywhere.

3. An unrelated question: Is there also a corresponding time dependent equation?
The time-dependence of your energy eigenfunctions is quite easy to calculate, it is just a rotation in the complex plane. Every state can be written as a superposition of them, and therefore solved with this system.
You can take every state and just let it evolve in time according to the Schrödinger equation, if you want.
 
Thanks so much mfb
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top