Schwarzschild & Kerr black holes geometries

JeffOCA
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hello

Let's consider a Schwarzschild BH.

A photon (or a massive particle) crossing the event horizon cannot be static : the r (radial) coordinate becomes a temporal coordinate. Therefore, the photon falls towards the central singularity (r=0). There is no way for him to escape : the horizon is a static limit

Now, the photon sphere is the spherical region of space where the orbital speed is equal to c. Only photons can orbit on the photon sphere but these orbits are very unstable.
If a photon crosses this sphere, can it remain static (without moving or falling towards the central singularity) ? Is going towards the singularity the only movement it can describe ?

Now, let's consider a Kerr BH. There are two horizons (inner and outer). By definition, the ergosphere is the region of space between the static limit and the outer horizon. A photon in the ergosphere cannot be static (it has crossed the static limit) and falls towards the singularity.
But, what happens at the crossing of the outer horizon and, after, when crossing of the inner horizon ? What kind of trajectories are possible ?

Thanks,
Jeff
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JeffOCA said:
If a photon crosses this sphere, can it remain static (without moving or falling towards the central singularity) ? Is going towards the singularity the only movement it can describe ?

If a photon crosses the photon sphere while going from greater to lesser r, it will hit the singularity. A photon can cross the the photon sphere while going from lesser to greater r. For example, a laser hovering between the photon sphere and the event horizon must be pointed "above horizontal" in order for its light to ecape. The closer the laser is to the event horizon, the more above horizontal the direction must be for escape.
JeffOCA said:
Now, let's consider a Kerr BH. There are two horizons (inner and outer). By definition, the ergosphere is the region of space between the static limit and the outer horizon. A photon in the ergosphere cannot be static (it has crossed the static limit) and falls towards the singularity.

Not necessarily. Again, this depends on the direction of the photon.
JeffOCA said:
But, what happens at the crossing of the outer horizon and, after, when crossing of the inner horizon ? What kind of trajectories are possible ?

I'll take a look at my references tomorrow.
 
JeffOCA said:
But, what happens at the crossing of the outer horizon and, after, when crossing of the inner horizon ? What kind of trajectories are possible ?

Technical reference: S. Chandrasekhar's The Mathematical Theory of Black holes, Chapter 7 The Geodesics in the Kerr Space-Time, section 63 the null geodesics,.

Non-Technical reference: Kaufmann's The Cosmic Frontiers of General Relativity, Chapter 12 The Geometry of the Kerr Solution.

Each of these books contains a wealth of good information; maybe you can get them from a library, possible through inter-library loans.
 
Thanks for these references !
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top