Science journalists to follow on twitter

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science Twitter
AI Thread Summary
Sean Carroll highlights the value of following science journalists on Twitter to stay updated on significant scientific developments, as they often link to interesting articles. Some participants express skepticism about Twitter's utility, preferring to rely on direct sources like science news websites such as phys.org and Science Direct, which allow for more focused content without the distractions associated with social media. The discussion emphasizes the importance of personal preference in information consumption, suggesting that individuals can test Twitter to see if it meets their needs for timely science updates. Additionally, it is recommended to follow reputable publications rather than individual journalists initially, especially for those new to the platform.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
So, I'm not on twitter but I just heard Sean Caroll say on his podcast that he's following science journalists on twitter and that he uses that to know when something interesting happens in science because these journalists will link to it. Do some of you do that also? I'd like to know who you think are some cool science journalists to follow on twitt0r.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Like you, I'm not on Twitter, @quasar987, but are intermittent interruptions of 'something interesting' based on other people's assessment a service you would value?

My alternative is to routinely plug-in "science news" to my browser, and also regularly review sites like phys.org and Science Direct, to see what's going on. It is considerably less intrusive than Twitter in distraction and personal data, and you can hone the topic, so "ev news" for example to just get electric vehicle updates.

I guess it depends on whether you feel you are missing something now, and if you do, you can test Twitter and see whether it fills the gap.

In terms of who to follow, if you're already listening to science podcasts, you're likely able to compile an initial hit list from guests you find engaging, but it probably makes more sense to follow publications than people, at least at the start unless you already know your specific areas of interest and are comfortable ignoring others.
 
Back
Top