Scientific notation question - backscatter or backscattering angle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the correct usage of the terms "backscatter angle" versus "backscattering angle" in the context of a thesis on electron backscattering. It clarifies that "backscatter" is a noun referring to the phenomenon, while "backscattered" serves as an adjective describing the electrons. The distinction is important for accurate scientific writing. The consensus suggests using "backscatter angle" as it aligns with the noun form. Proper terminology is crucial for clarity in academic research.
clau5
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi all,

I got a question about the spelling difference on a particular case.

I registered to address my problem to native English speakers(or people who can help me :)). Hopefully this is the right part of the forum.

Currently i am writing my thesis in English(i am not a native English speaking person)

My thesis deals with the research of electron backscattering.

Therefore is use the term "backscatter probability", "backscatter angle" and "backscatter energy" quite often.

What's the correct writing - backscatter angle or backscattering angle?

I think the difference between backscatter and backscattered is known to mebest regards
david
 
Science news on Phys.org
clau5 said:
I think the difference between backscatter and backscattered is known to me

Backscatter is a noun. It is a thing that happens

Backscattered is an adjective. It is a characteristic of something.

examples:

Since there was a distinct backscatter, it would be correct to say they were backscattered electrons
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'

Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'

Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
View full post »

Thread 'Effective absorption coefficient of gold nanoparticles'

I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
View full post »

Similar threads

Physics Guidance For Writing Scientific Papers In A Second Language
Replies
3
Views
3K
Overcoming English Difficulty to Learn Physics
Replies
21
Views
2K
Exploring the Fundamentals of the Universe: A Scientific Inquiry
Replies
2
Views
227
A Why does the free end refraction occur after Brewster's angle in TM?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Calculate tilt angle of a bar lifted via two ropes on fixed points
Replies
7
Views
3K
I Notation questions about kernel, cokernel, image and coimage
Replies
7
Views
619
Studying Chemistry or physics - which one is more suitable for self-studying?
Replies
14
Views
3K
B How should I express this angle in words?
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Sticky
How to use the "w" in www
Replies
0
Views
4K
Snell's law and the concept of critical angle
Replies
15
Views
11K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top