SE equation with a strong potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter eljose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
let be the SE with two potentials V and V_0 with N>>>>1 a big number..

i\hbar\frac{d\psi}{dt}=-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}D^{2}\psi+(V+NV_{0})\psi

then my question is how could we solve it approximately..thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know a solution for V_0, then change t as tN and x² as Nx² and V as V/N. Then perform a first order development with V/N as pertubation.

Note that V0 probably depends on x, and therefore you need to manage the change of variables x² -> Nx² in the potential term too.
If V0 as a dependence like VO(x/xref), then xref² has simply to be replaced by N xref². Should be simple.
 
thanks..i manage in a very similar way described by you:
first i divide all equation by N e=1/N tehn we would have:

ie\hbar\frac{d\psi}{dt}=-\frac{e\hbar^{2}}{2m}D^{2}\psi+(eV+V_{0})\psi

after that i define the Hamiltonian H_{0}=-\frac{e\hbar^{2}}{2m}D^{2}\psi+V_{0}\psi to solve this i use the WKB approach as e<<<1

then after that i treat V as a perturbation and solve it to first and second order...

But what is this good for?..let,s suppose we have a Lagrangian of the form L0+V with the potential then we could add a term NV0 in the Feynman Path-integral, to obtain the K0 propagator we use the development of Taylor of S near its classical solution in the form:

S[\phi]=S[\phi_{c}]+(1/2)\delta^{2}S[\phi_{c}]\phi^{2}+...

then we evaluate this functional integral to calculte K0,for the rest we use perturbation theory to calculate the corrections to first and second order...
 
Last edited:
Solve for the NV_0 and then use perturbation theory for the other potential...
 
Seems to me that more info is required. WKB is great, but not always valid. Can one solve with either potential; maybe one could solve exacly with both -- two square wells. Do you have a specific problem in mind? Are you talking bound states or scattering, or perhaps both? Given the magnitudes involved, will first order perturbation theory work? (One solvable case is a 1/r potential, with a very large angular momentum, with n=L*(L+1) so the effective potential is (-)q*q/r + n/(r*r), a good test case.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson



Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Back
Top