Searching for a Solid Proof of Chasles/Mozzi/Cauchy's Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ObsessiveMathsFreak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Solid Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Chasles' Theorem states that any rigid body displacement can be represented as a screw motion, involving a circular helical path about a common axis. The original poster seeks a solid, linear algebraic proof, expressing dissatisfaction with existing proofs that lack rigor. They discovered a highly recommended paper by Dunham Jackson that thoroughly explains rigid body motions and their decomposition into screw motions, although it lacks diagrams. The poster has developed a semi-proof for the 2D case and is interested in exploring the 3D case further. The discussion highlights the importance of finding clear, convincing proofs for complex mathematical theorems.
ObsessiveMathsFreak
Messages
404
Reaction score
8
I've unsuccessfully been looking for a decent proof of Chasles' Theorem which states that any rigid body displacement whatsoever can be decomposed into a screw motion. In other words, no matter what the displacement is, you can consider it the result of the partiles having moved to their positions by following a circular helixical path about a common axis, with a common angular speed.

I suppose I'm mostly looking for a (linear) algebraic type proof. Most proofs I've encountered have been fairly loose and unconvincing. Does anyone know of a solid proof of this theorem?

Awkwardly, this theorem is also variously known as Mozzi's or Cauchy's screw theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In answer to my own question:

Shortly after making this post I stumbled across one of the best papers I've ever read.
http://www.jstor.org/view/00029890/di991259/99p1550p/0 by Dunham Jackson. It's old, but great, and completely and totally explains rigid body motions and their decompositions into rotations and translations and finally into screw motions. He refers to the theorem as Mozzi's theorem.

It's a great paper. I'd seriously recommend anyone to give it an hour of their time. It's an easy read, and the proofs are just brilliant. The only thing I could fault it on is a lack of diagrams.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the link, this is a problem I've been annoyed with for a while too. I've worked out a semi-proof for the 2d case using similar triangles, but I would like to see the 3d case as well. Do you have a link for a free copy of the paper?
 
EFuzzy said:
Thanks for the link, this is a problem I've been annoyed with for a while too. I've worked out a semi-proof for the 2d case using similar triangles, but I would like to see the 3d case as well. Do you have a link for a free copy of the paper?
Attached is a copy of the paper.
 

Attachments

Thanks!
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top