Second fundamental theorem of calculus.

Click For Summary
The second fundamental theorem of calculus states that the derivative of the integral from a to x of a function f(s) is equal to f(x). When reversing the bounds of integration, the integral changes sign, leading to the conclusion that the derivative of the integral from x to a of f(s) is -f(x). The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the sign change when integrating with reversed limits. Additionally, methods for evaluating the exterior derivative are mentioned, including using coordinate charts and smooth paths. The conversation clarifies that the initial interpretation of the integral's derivative was incorrect due to this sign error.
operationsres
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Let f(x) be a non-stochastic mapping f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}. The second fundamental theorem of calculus states that:

\frac{d}{dx} \int_a^x f(s)ds = f(x).
*QUESTION 1* Is the following true?

\frac{d}{dx} \int_x^a f(s)ds = f(x).

*QUESTION 2* Related to this, how can I evaluate/simplify/express:

d\int_x^a f(s)ds.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first question, what happens to the integral when you reverse the bounds on integration? This should tell you that your answer is not quite correct, modulo only a sign error.

The next answer depends on your context and there are a few ways to do this. The first is to simply use the definition of the exterior derivative. Assuming you are just working on \mathbb R you have that for any function (0-form) F, then in a coordinate chart you have
dF = \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} dx.
Alternatively, if you let \gamma: [0,1] \to \mathbb R be a smooth path such that \gamma(0) = a, \gamma'(0) = v then
d_a F(v) = \left. \frac{d}{dt} \right|_{t=0} (F \circ \gamma).
Both will give you the same solution, the the latter is coordinate independent.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kreizhn said:
For the first question, what happens to the integral when you reverse the bounds on integration? This should tell you that your answer is not quite correct, modulo only a sign error.

The next answer depends on your context and there are a few ways to do this. The first is to simply use the definition of the exterior derivative. Assuming you are just working on \mathbb R you have that for any function (0-form) F, then in a coordinate chart you have
dF = \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} dx.
Alternatively, if you let \gamma: [0,1] \to \mathbb R be a smooth path such that \gamma(0) = a, \gamma'(0) = v then
d_a F(v) = \left. \frac d{dt} \right|_{t=0} (F\circ \gamma).
Both will give you the same solution, the the latter is coordinate independent.

Hi,

I'm not sure what "modulo" means?

It would make sense if the solution to QUESTION1 is actually -f(x), is that what you were saying?
 
"modulo a sign error" meant "correct except possibly a sign error".

Yes, \int_x^a f(t)dt= -\int_a^x f(t)dt and then apply the fundamental theorem.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K