See Earth's Surface from the Past: Resolution Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenAce92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Surface
GreenAce92
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
If you can "catch up" to the light reflected from the Earth at that time in the past. What kind of resolution would you get? Could you zoom into the surface such that people/animals could be visible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A more practical approach would be to observe the reflection of Earth from some distant object, given that nothing can overtake a photon. What kind of distant body would be sufficiently reflective, and where to look for one, is an issue.
 
Sadly, you can't "catch up" to the light that was emitted by the Earth since light is the fastest thing in the universe.

But if you're asking what an alien in another star system might see, then it really depends on what he is using to look at the Earth. The bigger the telescope, the better resolution he will have.
 
The resolution is the same.

Imagine looking at the Earth from Alpha Centauri right now, you'll see the Earth as it was 4.4 years ago.

The view will be the same weather you traveled via a hot air balloon or via instantaneous teleportation.
 
I would say that at astronomical distances, the light reflected by the Earth (which is not that much to start with) gets so spread into space that looking from any single definite location it would be practically impossible to see anything of the size of a person or an animal, no matter how big your telescope was. The amount of photons you could collect would simply be too small.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top