Seebeck Effect a bit of a puzzler

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arkasha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bit
AI Thread Summary
The Seebeck effect requires dissimilar metals due to their differing atomic numbers and electron densities, which create a contact potential difference at the junctions. Using the same metal would not produce the necessary electron diffusion to generate a voltage potential. This phenomenon is analogous to an electrochemical cell, where current is generated only with two different materials. While it is possible to produce the Seebeck effect with a single material, the traditional approach involves using two distinct metals or semiconductors. Understanding these principles clarifies the necessity of dissimilar metals in thermoelectric applications.
Arkasha
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello all,
I was recently talking about the Seebeck effect with one of my colleagues, and we've run into a bit of a puzzle.
Why are *dissimilar* metals required to produce it? All of the various sources I've consulted state very clearly there must be two different metals (or I suppose you could cheat a bit and use a semiconductor, like Pasco does in its little toys), but none of the sources explained why!
I would have thought that the electron diffusion from the hot to the cold side of each part would create the greatest potential difference if the same metal was used for each "leg."
Clearly there must be something wrong with my thinking . . .
Enlightenment received with gratitude!
:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Seebeck effect can be produced in a single material. Dissimilar metals are not required to create a voltage potential amongst a single piece.

Take a look at the following link. The answer you need is the first paragraph of section 3 (thermocouples).

http://kasap3.usask.ca/samples/Thermoelectric-Seebeck.pdf
 
Arkasha said:
Hello all,
I was recently talking about the Seebeck effect with one of my colleagues, and we've run into a bit of a puzzle.
Why are *dissimilar* metals required to produce it? All of the various sources I've consulted state very clearly there must be two different metals (or I suppose you could cheat a bit and use a semiconductor, like Pasco does in its little toys), but none of the sources explained why!
I would have thought that the electron diffusion from the hot to the cold side of each part would create the greatest potential difference if the same metal was used for each "leg."
Clearly there must be something wrong with my thinking . . .
Enlightenment received with gratitude!
:smile:

Obviously it is because only different metals, because of their different atomic numbers, have different electron density, producing electron diffusion at the juntiions.
This results in what is called contact potential difference. For two gases to diffuse from one to the other. they must have different pressure. The picture is similar to an electrochemical cell where current is produced only two dissimilar metals are used.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top