Seeing the milky way in it's past

  • Thread starter Thread starter Snuka_wut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    milky way
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the possibility of observing the Milky Way as it existed billions of years ago through deep field images, given the finite speed of light and the universe's expansion. However, it argues that since we are within the Milky Way, the light from it has always traveled the same distance to us, meaning we see it as it was 30,000 years ago, not billions. The expansion of the universe does not affect the size of galaxies, as gravity keeps them intact despite the expansion. Furthermore, the discussion highlights that due to the universe's expansion, light emitted from one side may never reach the other, complicating the idea of tracking our galaxy's evolution. Ultimately, the expansion could lead to extreme consequences, including the potential disintegration of matter in the distant future.
Snuka_wut
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Alright, this has been egging me for awhile now, so here it goes. If light has a finite speed, and the rate of acceleration of the expansion of the universe has sped inflation up past this finite speed, is it possible that one of the young galactic cores we observed through the deep field image is in fact the milky way as it was billions of years ago, with that light just now reaching us? And if that's possible do you think we could track, via imagery, the evolution of our galaxy?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Snuka_wut said:
is it possible that one of the young galactic cores we observed through the deep field image is in fact the milky way as it was billions of years ago, with that light just now reaching us? And if that's possible do you think we could track, via imagery, the evolution of our galaxy?
No
Two reasons, since we are in the milky way we have been moving with it as space expands, so the light from it has always had the same distance to travel to us. So we have always seen the center (30,000lyr away) as it was 30,000yr before NOW for all NOW

Secondly expansion of the universe doesn't change the size of galaxies - things which are held together by gravity stay together as the universe expands.
It's like imagining a river flowing out to sea. The river flow expands out into the ocean, but a boat that is floating down the river doesn't stretch out when it reaches the ocean - it is held together by bolts/welds etc in the same way as gravity holds a galaxy together.
 
Is this related to the analogy of the expanding universe like an inflating balloon? One possible conclusion of this is if you look far enough, you will see yourself (or your galaxy) off in the distance, the line of sight wrapping all the way around the balloon and back. I believe the answer to this is "most likely not". The expansion of the universe results in a Doppler shift so high that light emitted from one side of the universe would never get to the other side. Another way to put it is the distance between opposite points increases by at least one light year every year.

Another consequence is that if you were to take a high-relativistic spaceship out to circumnavigate the universe, at one point you would realize that you could never get to your destination and you could never return home. The universe at beyond some distance behaves though it is expanding faster then the speed of light. If the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is real, someday expansion may be so high, it will rip apart stars, atoms and subatomic particles.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top