Self-rotating body with speed of light

rsuryatheja
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am not a physics guy but I got this idea, sorry if this is a dumb question.

What happens if a self-rotating solid cone that accelerates to speed of light in space. Imagine that it has a circular base and at the apex there is only one atom.

What happens to it, it it going to get disintegrated when it reaches the speed of light? Is conical base is going to be effected first or the apex of one atom?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean that you have a body that rotates and then you take a bystander who moves really close to C compared to this rotating body and imagines how he would see it?
What would happen is that according to a bystander it would now rotate slower due to time dilation.
 
First of all there are no truly rigid objects in relativity. If you rotate anything very fast it has no choice but to distort into a different shape. The apex wouldn't be affected, but the stretching or squashing would get worse further away.

Secondly, even if you had a sufficiently flexible elastic cone that wouldn't shatter into pieces, there isn't enough energy in the Universe to spin the cone fast enough to reach the speed of light.

EDIT: I assumed above that you were referring to the rotational speed reaching the speed of light, not that the cone was rotating slower but moving sideways as well. But there's still not enough energy for anything to reach the speed of light.
 
Last edited:
DrGreg said:
First of all there are no truly rigid objects in relativity. If you rotate anything very fast it has no choice but to distort into a different shape. The apex wouldn't be affected, but the stretching or squashing would get worse further away.

Secondly, even if you had a sufficiently flexible elastic cone that wouldn't shatter into pieces, there isn't enough energy in the Universe to spin the cone fast enough to reach the speed of light.

Very true, the mechanical work to accomplish such a feat is infinite.
 

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Observing a rotating body when approaching it at near light speed
Replies
8
Views
1K
I Has anyone measured the speed of light in one direction?
Replies
45
Views
6K
B Why does it require an infinite amount of energy to reach the speed of light?
3
Replies
130
Views
13K
B Speed of light and this Accelerating Rocket scenario
Replies
45
Views
5K
I Is Erik's Paradox Challenging Our Understanding of Gravity and Light Speed?
Replies
18
Views
2K
I How to Measure Speed of Light & Is It Constant?
Replies
13
Views
3K
B How to add an object's multiple relativistic speeds from x, y, and z?
Replies
37
Views
2K
I Can we determine the one way speed of light by combined measurements?
3
Replies
146
Views
10K
B Does Force Travel Faster Than Light?
Replies
8
Views
3K
I Measuring One-Way Anisotropy of Light Speed
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top