Semi-infinite non-conducting rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter kinof
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E) at point P, located a distance R above one end of a semi-infinite non-conducting rod with a uniform linear charge density (λ). The key conclusion is that the electric field makes an angle of 45° with the rod, which is independent of the distance R. The calculations reveal that both components of the electric field, E_x and E_y, equal \(\frac{k\lambda}{R}\), confirming the 45° angle due to their equal magnitudes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Knowledge of the concept of linear charge density (λ)
  • Basic understanding of trigonometry and angles in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of integration in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their properties
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields in different geometries, such as infinite and finite rods
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding electric fields generated by charged objects.

kinof
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A "semi-infinite" nonconducting rod has a uniform linear charge density λ. Show that the electric field E at point P a distance R above one end of the rod makes an angle of 45° with the rod and that this result is independent of the distance R.



Homework Equations


$$\vec{E}=\int \frac{k\lambda }{r^2}dx$$



The Attempt at a Solution


I have found that $$\vec{E_x}=\frac{-k\lambda}{\sqrt{R^2+x^2}}$$ and $$\vec{E_y}=\frac{k\lambda x}{R\sqrt{R^2+x^2}}$$

I have tried to show that, if Ex and Ey make a 45° angle, then they must be equal, but that leads nowhere. I have tried simply taking the arctan of Ey/Ex, but that leads to -x/R, which doesn't make sense. I have also tried evaluating the integrals at infinity and then using L'Hospital's rule, but it doesn't work for Ey.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After integrating, did you evaluate at the limits of integration? ##x## should not appear in the results.
 
Oh, woops. I got $$\frac{k\lambda}{R}$$ for both. Of course the ratio of these is 1, so the angle is 45 degrees. Thanks.
 
Looks good!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
742
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
4K