Semi-infinite non-conducting rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter kinof
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a "semi-infinite" non-conducting rod with a uniform linear charge density λ, and it requires showing that the electric field E at a point P above one end of the rod makes a 45° angle with the rod, independent of the distance R.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the components of the electric field, with attempts to show that the components make a 45° angle by setting them equal. There are questions about the limits of integration and the appearance of the variable x in the results.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on evaluating limits of integration and noted that the ratio of the electric field components leads to the desired angle. There is an indication that the discussion is progressing towards a resolution, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need to evaluate integrals properly and the implications of the variable x in the context of the problem setup.

kinof
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A "semi-infinite" nonconducting rod has a uniform linear charge density λ. Show that the electric field E at point P a distance R above one end of the rod makes an angle of 45° with the rod and that this result is independent of the distance R.



Homework Equations


$$\vec{E}=\int \frac{k\lambda }{r^2}dx$$



The Attempt at a Solution


I have found that $$\vec{E_x}=\frac{-k\lambda}{\sqrt{R^2+x^2}}$$ and $$\vec{E_y}=\frac{k\lambda x}{R\sqrt{R^2+x^2}}$$

I have tried to show that, if Ex and Ey make a 45° angle, then they must be equal, but that leads nowhere. I have tried simply taking the arctan of Ey/Ex, but that leads to -x/R, which doesn't make sense. I have also tried evaluating the integrals at infinity and then using L'Hospital's rule, but it doesn't work for Ey.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After integrating, did you evaluate at the limits of integration? ##x## should not appear in the results.
 
Oh, woops. I got $$\frac{k\lambda}{R}$$ for both. Of course the ratio of these is 1, so the angle is 45 degrees. Thanks.
 
Looks good!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
4K