Semiconductor: Solid-source Diffusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on verifying the specifications for phosphorous-doped resistors using solid-source diffusion with PH-950 wafers. Participants are calculating the doping profile, junction depth, and sheet resistance based on provided equations and manufacturer data. A discrepancy arises as calculations yield a junction depth of only 0.19 μm, significantly less than the claimed 1.3 μm, leading to concerns about potential errors in the calculations or the manufacturer's specifications. Clarification is sought regarding the background doping concentration and whether the reported junction depth might pertain to a subsequent process. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate data interpretation in semiconductor diffusion processes.
mbrmbrg
Messages
485
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



You use the solid diffusion source wafers PH-950 from St. Gobain (see data sheet on TSquare, Diffusion Chapter) to form phosphorous-doped resistors in a p-type wafer with a background doping concentration of 1015 cm-3. According to the data sheet, a 60-min predeposition at 925°C should yield a sheet resistance of 10 Ω/sq. and a junction depth of approx. xj = 1.3 μm.

(a) Verify these numbers by calculating (and plotting) the doping profile ND(x), the junction
depth xj, and the sheet resistance. Assume that the surface concentration reaches the solid
solubility at the pre-deposition temperature.

(b) What thickness must a masking oxide have to locally prevent P-diffusion?

Homework Equations



C(x,t)=C_serf\left\frac{x}{2\sqrt{Dt}}\right

D=D_0^{-E_a/kT}+D_0_-^{-E_a_-/kT}+D_0_--^{-E_a_--/kT}

The Attempt at a Solution


See attached

Briefly, I'm trying to plot concentration as a function of x, so I solved for D and plugged everything into the equation for C(x,t), with t=3600s. However, that returns an answer that the concentration > 0 only when the depth is < 0.19um. As the manufactuer claims a junction depth of 1.3um, I assume I did something very, very wrong.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1.3 micron sounds awfully deep for those parameters. Are you sure you have the manufacturers specs right? Maybe the 1.3 micron Xj is after a subsequent drive-in? I think you did the calculations correctly for what you were given
 
Oh, dear. The manufacturer's specs are stated in the problem, and I checked it on the graphs the manufacturer gives out. Sounds unreasonable, but that's what they say, and I can't imagine they'd get away with such an egregious error. I must be making a mistake somewhere...

To clarify, the wafers have a background doping concentration of 1015 cm-3. (I lost formatting when I copied and pasted.) Either way, though, I'm still getting a ridiculously small junction depth.
 
Back
Top